 
|
mike UK
 |
Absolutely right, I could not agree more, the government which lost our bank details does not seem to understand that more Muslims= more Islamic terrorism ( I am not saying all Muslims are terrorists) but allowing 2,000,000 to settle in the UK was a mistake bigger even than the Iraq war.
Again we see the "racism" jibe from pseudo intellectual half-wits. Islam is not a race and the failed countries of Africa and the middle east will ruin this country if they have not done so already |
|
SR13
 |
Because Britain is run by utter morons. Has it taken this long for you to figure it out? |
|
Ollie
|
This country is crazy. |
|
Venky
|
yeah u are right |
|
Philip H ©
 |
We have this problem because the government changed the law which allows people now to claim asylum on arrival into the UK. An asylum seeker is someone who has genuine need to live in safe country because there life is in danger. The UN states that someone who is seeking asylum should do so in the nearest safe country to them (not the UK which is thousands of miles away ).
Unfortunately this quite noble system has been massively abused by not only people from the middle east but also Africa, who have abused this system in order to obtain entry to the UK. Some of these may be genuine asylum seekers, some have come here to earn money, some have come here to claim benefits and some may be terrorists, the problem is, as you point out we just don't know who is who. Once here if they are proved not to be genuine asylum seekers the human rights regulations in this country make it very difficult for them to be deported as they have numerous rights of appeal to varies courts which can drag deportation proceedings on for as a long as ten years.
To answer your question the Government allows so many people here because it can't really do anything about it unless it changes the laws which are being abused, which it has no plans to do. The only political parties which intend to change these laws are Conservative/UKIP/BNP if you don't like something use your democratic right to change it. |
|
goonern014
|
exactly someone who is actually using there brain Wahoo!! same with america yet mexicans and who ever flys into mexico can just walk over the boarder . ask your self why is it tthe case that there has only been 1 terrorist event in both countries if there were such an amazing threat it woulda happened 100 times over by now .
give these a watch http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598&q=loose+change+final+cut&total=176&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261&total=100&start=60&num=10&so=0&type=t100_gbr&plindex=63
shows you why and answers your quetion and more !!! |
|
BrigadeGeneral
|
Government have been to sloppy about it. It`s rather late now to do something about it. It`ll be much harder to force them out of the country than to refuse them entry. They should never had been allowed to enter. How the hell can those iraqis own expensive cars in the U.K if they` are so poor? |
|
howaytheladlee
|
yes |
|
UTOPIA OR BUST,
|
there are some in britain that are talking of terror acts and they are not from the middle east either. heard a bnp supporter even mention civil war. finally mike ingham since when has 1.7% of 60 million been two million. not to mention there are White english people that are Muslim anyway. are you saying the thrity are so thousand that are white are terrorists as well.
The BNP terrorists
The conviction of Robert Cottage for possession of explosives has once again highlighted the link between BNP members and racial violence and terrorism. While the BNP moved quickly to distance itself from the actions of a man who stood in three local elections as a BNP candidate, he joins a growing list of BNP members who have engaged in some form of terrorist or murderous behaviour. Here are a few recent examples:
DAVID COPELAND – London nail bomber David Copeland brought havoc to London when he set off three nail bombs in 1999. He was a BNP member and activist in East London. He told police when questioned that he wanted to ignite a race war in Britain so that the white population would vote for a BNP government.
TONY LECOMBER – Nick Griffin’s chief lieutenant Tony Lecomber was convicted and imprisoned for three years for five offences under the Explosives Act after he tried to blow up the offices of a political party. Police found hand grenades and detonators at his home. Despite this the BNP kept him on its payroll for over ten years. He was eventually forced out of his job after he approached Joe Owens to kill a leading politician.
ALLEN BOYCE and TERRY COLLINS In July 2006 Allen Boyce, a BNP supporter, received a two-year suspended sentence for providing Terry Collins, a BNP activist, with bomb making instructions. Collins himself was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in 2005 for conducting a racist terror campaign against the Asian community in Eastbourne.
MARK BULLMAN – arsonist Mark Bulman, a BNP activist, was jailed for five years in January after trying to set fire to Swindon’s Broad Street mosque. He used a BNP leaflet as a fuse for his petrol bomb.
JOE OWENS – gangland hitman. For three years until summer 2004 Joe Owens acted as the personal bodyguard to Nick Griffin, the BNP leader, as well as being the Merseyside organiser of the BNP. However, Owens was also known locally as a gangland hitman, whom police had linked to several underworld murders. |
|
mccormack_thomas
|
The terrorist threat in Britain comes from people who were born here.
There are many illegal immigrants smuggled into the country. Any one of them could be a potential terrorist and there's nothing we can do about that.
But to keep out people simply because they came from a particular area smacks of racism and it clearly wouldn't offer us any more protection. |
|
There will always be an England
 |
I agree there are many nice western thinking people from these countries who want to escape the thumb on thier heads, but until we find a way to stop the terrorists entering our isles we need to stop all immigration from the middle east..no probs with the polish etc, just the middle east is too volatile at the moment. |
|
maccrew6
|
Same thing is happening in the US...... I saw a bumper sticker that I loved.. it said "what part of 'the terrorists want to kill us' don't you morons understand?" |
|
L C
|
It's funny how liberals aren't dying to answer this question.
You make a great point. In America, 'conscious' people worry about this same thing as well. It's kinda scary, but all we can hope for are better laws that can better guarantee safety for our countries and others. |
|
MaryBlue
 |
Your question is out of order because you do assume that everyone of them want to harm us despite what you said to the contrary.
Is everyone in Britain going to be arrested because of a few people's crimes here - of course not!
Also you're forgetting that most of the 'terrorists' were born and bred in Britain.
Surely that is telling us something about British society. |
|
lila
 |
Too late, some of the biggest terrorists are already living on British soil.
Most of the London bombers were born and bred in England (scary) and there are many more willing followers.
The British gov.have acted like idiots for so long and only now have seen the light of day,what a shame it was'nt a few years ago. |
|
usv1_co
 |
Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’
Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fighters.
It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person can be judged accordingly.
7. Islam means peace
Islam is derived from the word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace throughout the world.
Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society. |
|
madhavan n
|
it is your resposibility to screen people |
|
john n
|
Don't forget the Irish.............. |
|
jason
|
Blow the muslim countries off the map |
|
David_the_Great
|
I think that they are being screen better. Also, the security is better since 2005. The mosque are under survellience. |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
