|

Croxx
|
The UK does not need any as my quality of life just keeps getting better with mass immigration! |
|

siderman
|
Why do you have locks on your doors? Can I come to your house and take your T.V.? May I have my way with your wife? Maybe she would prefer me to you to say no is racist. Why dont you give me your paycheck as well. If we had no laws this is what would happen. Dont be so blind. |
|

mike UK
 |
Badly controlled immigration has already almost ruined the UK, unrestricted immigration would mean we would have to all carry AK45s because several senior police have verified that a massive amount of crime has come to the UK via immigration.
Frankly I am tired of being called "racist" for wanting to keep our country which we took 2000 years to build. Please go and build your own civilised country and do not use the dishonest "racist" mantra to steal our country.
Your picture shows that you are the type of immigrant we can do without |
|

Doc
 |
Just ask an American Indian about what happens when you don't have immigration control... |
|

Captain Sarcasm
 |
Because our country has an infrastructure funded by working tax payers. Our infrastructure relies on the majority working, paying taxes and thereby funding the system.
Migration therefore has to be controlled so that we keep the balance between those paying into the system and those using the infrastructure.
The persons race is irrelevant IF they bring more to the economy than the take out then that's fine. If they bring a family of six to the UK and all work and pay tax all well and good, the system gains and we become stronger as an economy, if they bring a family of two and only one works and pays taxes there is more demand on our taxes and the system suffer.
Its a case of simple economics not discrimination by race. |
|

little k
 |
How would you like it if a foreign worker came to your coutry and took your job because he/she was paid less because they didn't know the law of the land? |
|

sunstarr # 3
 |
Well, because when you let too many minorities in your country and give them the right to vote, they vote in socialists. |
|

AlenaT
|
First of all because illegals live on american expenses and while american can afford only 2 kids maximum mexican can push to 10 if not controlled. And the second of all if you want to keep this country calling USA instead of USM ( united states of mexico) :-) |
|

sparks
 |
If we didn't have immigration control 99% of Mexico's population would move to the USA. Mexico's people need to stay home and help their president fix Mexico's economy. |
|

david
|
we wouldn't if the rest of the world had the same rules such as benefits claims say you lived in florida beach area and could claim the same as living here in the u.k then you could choose where you wanted to live but then the sunny countries would end up with massive overcrowding. its just not practical to do that. |
|

Salem
|
every country in the world has immigration controls
you don't let random people enter your house any time they want, do you? |
|

Steve
 |
why bother we let any thucker in |
|

george a
|
yes i have often wondered what they do. |
|

wolfie
|
If you're rich then you'll find that border controls lose their significance.
Workers have travelled throughout the world for century's in pursuit of work and a better life...and quite often fleeing war and oppression.
Most people who migrate to another country do so for work and actually are a benefit to the country they go to. As a former international development worker it's my experience that people tend to migrate as a last option. Most people would prefer to stay where they are and, but for economic and political oppression, and war, would do so.
I think that the whole paranoia about immigration is stirred up by mainstream politicians and their media to create a smokescreen to obscure the real issue...rampant international capitalism!
No immigrant has ever put me out of a job, or shut down my factory, or repossessed my home! |
|

|
|
|