Do you agree?

David C

Honestly i have had the same thoughts. But then how are we better then the criminal that commited the act. I know that just taking thier freedom and time doesnt compare in the least to thier crime. But that is the way the law works. It is thought that if we deal with them this way (prison, jail time, etc) that we are a better kind then as to put them through the same crime they commited. Hey i am with you all the way just to let you know...remember that Karma is a *****. Some convicted rapests are forced to pick up the soap if you know what i mean.

Macky

One part of me thinks no, because that would make us as bad as them.........
The other part of me thinks yeah that could work. Only with the paedophiles I would lock them in a room full of mothers.All armed with razor blades....

Welshchick

Wow, you are now going to have the "human rights" brigade bombarding this question!
Do you know of any Human Rights campaigner that has been a victim of crime?

By the By I agree.......eye for an eye..........a tooth for a tooth etc...........

life is

yep good idea

Gottlos

Yes.
Or just put a bullet in their head...

"The death penalty doesn't stop killers does it?"
hah

sunshine

I agree. Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.

Bud's Girl

As long as the state is 100% sure that person is guilty. Go for it. Sounds babaric, but it nips the behavior right in the bud.

Canadian Chick Eh

Yes, an eye for an eye! It has to be a controlled environment of course but who knows it may just be the deterrent they need cause the laws & sentences in pkace now sure don't scare them!

Ryder

yeah if the evidence is un deniable how would u feel if this was done to some1 wrongly convicted. but then again would this then make them h8 the world even more so

? BlueBerry ?

i think you're wrong. an eye for an eye thing is kind of middle ages law enforcement attitude. are you familiar with the universal declaration on human rights ?

i agree 100%

the world would be a better place if people understood how the others feel

oki doki

how will you render justice to a mass murderer ? you get to kill him once only and he won't feel the agony of being killed multiple times ?

teetzijo

Well. killing killers doesn't work and it costs an awful lot of taxpayer money. I'm more in favor of long prison terms in prisons that had to be self supporting by means of inmate labor. Not "make work" real labor for money that also teaches skills and precludes any foolishness like gang involvement in prison. Punishment isn't the answer, but restitution through honest labor might.

Eve

No, because this would make you as cruel as they are. Violence will never stop. In Albania for instance they have the tradition of the ''blood feud'' - if someone is killed from a family, then a life must be taken in the family of the killer. And then again, and again, and they end up killing each other for ages.
Also, Mark Twain describes a feud like this in one of his books (Huckleberry Fin I think).
It is also technically impossible. How do you punish a paedophile doing to him the same thing he has done to a child? You cannot take him back in his childhood, and even if you could, would it be fair to do anything bad to a kid? What would that make you?
A civilised society should have other ways to discipline its members - not through torture or death.

P W

Your conclusion has no support.

You know what prison is like? Ever hear the saying "don't pick up the soap?"

If the fear of going to prison doesn't stop them, the threat of putting them into a pit with some dog won't either.

The death penalty doesn't stop killers does it?

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: