|

loril20042000
|
If they know that they have hiv, they should be tried with manslaughter. |
|

auld mom
|
No, nor should the public be forced to pay for their medication. Let them die. |
|

Styll
 |
why would you lesson the sentence?..seems to me that the sentence should be increased (and often is) for willfully infecting someone...oh and boys and men get raped as well |
|

Welshchick
 |
NO an offence is an offence, if they infect they should get bloody life! |
|

cpr_dummy2003
 |
here the offender get charged with attempted murderfor infecting someone with aids. |
|

whatelks67
|
No i do not think that they should get a lesser sentence because of their status.
I think just the opposite, they should get a stiffer sentence because of their status. they know what the disease will do to someone, because it is happening to them. Yet they decide to do whatever it is they are going to do and will infect someone else willingly. that is premeditated murder as far as i am concerned, that that carrys the penalty of death. |
|

noobienoob2000
 |
NO. They've let their fear, hatred and evil control their actions.
Let ol' sparky take care of them. |
|

Ian S
 |
No they should get whatevers coming to them, the longer the better. |
|

Judge Dredd
 |
I don't believe so. Personally I think anyone that has the HIV and puts someone else at risk for infection during the commission of a crime, it should be an aggravated offense. |
|

Michael R
|
What kind of question is that? The HIV or AIDs virus is not making them rape people. If anything they should be getting more of a sentence because they signed a death warrant for their victims. |
|

FLOYD
|
no |
|

v Ă b o r a
 |
No |
|

josette d
 |
no i do not they had hiv when they commited the crime and hiv didnot stop them so they should get no special treatment and less time . like saying goes if you do the crime you do the time |
|

Paul K
|
It should not matter one way or the other. But if any group should be treated harsher, it should be the HIV and AIDS people.
They should be rounded up and their illness should be aggressively treated in a controlled facility with full expectation of cure and release when appropriate. |
|

*****
 |
No, because the crime is not lessen by the fact that they have HIV. |
|

birdsnakecatharine
 |
Democrats believe that rapists should have to attend a "sensitivity course". |
|

mrklcoac2002
 |
heck no, if the offender KNOWINGLY infects someone, then i believe that they should be charged with attempted murder or if the person dies they should be charged with first degree murder |
|

native
|
no, that would give anyone with HIV a reason to commit crime without fear of long prison terms. |
|

nbr660
 |
NO |
|

Lucianna
 |
A bullet to the brain to speed up the AIDS process comes to mind.
Or put them in prison and let nature take it's course and control the prison population at the same time.
Either way works for me. |
|

big daddy
 |
OH HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|

TopGun
|
I Personally feel someone who Lies about there Status and goes around infecting others with Hiv Aids on purpose out of Evil should be publicly OUTED Photo in every paper TV station publicly exposed in every form and STONED to DEATH Especially that Adelaide guy , And the Victoms should receive Compo for Damages caused All Victoms regardless |
|

|
|
|