|

panthrchic
|
Pretty simple answer actually. The country, the world is on a new sense of alert. Never before have we felt the need to be so pro-active towards terroristic threats. For instance, the man who turned in the "Dix Six" video. That never would have happened pre-9/11. Bush has implemented phone tapping and surveillence (that the liberals hate) that has had extremely positive results. I understand the desire for privacy, but when you're suspected of being a threat to the people of this country, your rights should be put on hold till further notice! |
|

Maureen B
 |
Simply because the threats for 9/11 were ignored by our idiotic government..Now they take ALL threats seriously.. |
|

Steven C
 |
because 9/11 was a money gain they got their money now they are happy to stop other attacks. 9/11 wasn't an attack it was planned. http://loosechange911.com |
|

meathead
 |
We had left over CIA and FBI from Clinton years where they were not allowed to share information. It took 9/11 to open some eyes up to see how vulnerable we were. |
|

Sweetpea
|
let's see, we now have the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot act. We have more people focused on the problem too. |
|

Chief Yellow Horse
|
Bill Clinton |
|

aLySSa<3
 |
Because they're more aware now |
|

tyler
 |
we Could have stopped 9/11 but no one really belived that it would actually happen so they didnt want to waste ressources and time. but now that they know terrorists are hard core and will go to extremes they'll put more effort into stopping them. |
|

dano718boy
|
You don't really know if they would have worked are not. Right now they are looking hard for any thing that might be an attacks real or not. I know as a youth man after Vietnam. We though things and plan things that were dead wrong, but never went the last step. Thank God. Time make you wiser and more forgiving. Why do you think that bombers are almost always young men? Hormones and rage are at thier peak at ages of 18 - 25. It is easier to get them to die for a cause. |
|

Kevy
|
its just like, no matter how many cops are on the streets, you cant stop all crime, but usually the more that are out there (and the more they pay attn) the less crime there is |
|

kveryeffective
 |
The people in intel couldn't share information because Clinton had a wall built between them. The woman who wrote that was on the 9/11 committee. |
|

kim t
|
To make a long story short, the left hand doen't know what the right hand is doing. |
|

J&J W
|
Simply put, after 9/11 several major changes were made, changes that should have been made much earlier by one Bill Clinton, in the way we handle terror investigations, homeland security, and the like. An entire new government entity, the department of homeland security, was created. The most important changes, however, were the Patriot act, and the subsequent law changes that allowed the FBI, CIA, NSA, state and local police, and miltiary intelligence to share information and cooperate. If these things had been done before 9/11, we would have stopped that too. |
|

VICTOR H
|
kind of fishy, huh ? |
|

Got mice?
 |
PNAC needed a false flag event to further their agenda. |
|

thunder217
 |
maybe now they take it seriously |
|

Mister2-15-2
|
Republician Congress would not give President Clinton tools he needed. His administration knew thre were cells of bad guys but they would not give him expanded wire tap laws, and he may have asked for change of regulations so FBI and CIA could exchange information. What was someone planning. |
|

high_plains_drifter_1857
 |
British MP suspects Cheney in 911
British Member of Parliment says
"It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the U.S. of the
9/11 attacks."
READ THE ARTICLE !
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3036meacher_cheney.html |
|

I was Thinking
 |
What new attacks? Did I miss something!
They are arresting people who are talking about spitting on the sidewalk. No written plans, no explosives, no evidence, how American justice works amuses others besides OJ |
|

|
|
|