Where do you stand on highspeed police pursuits?

loco_tech85

Unfortunately, this topic contains a double-edged sword. Yes, you are correct, those that break the law and then decide to flee, should not be allowed to get away and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. However, most police departments (mine included) are afraid of the civil liability that they might be held accountable for if a police officer chasing someone (essentially only for a traffic summons) gets involved in an accident. This is especially true if the accident involves injury and/or death.

My Police Department (NYPD) will usually not allow its Highway Patrol Officers to chase an individual if a) it's way to aggressive a speed (well over 100mph) or b) if the pursuit exits the highway and goes down to the street level (which is understandable), but they don't have in place a procedure in which to attempt to later apprehend this vehicle and it's driver. A Police Officer has to be creative in order to accomplish this mission.

I have even heard NYPD supervisors calling off "pursuits" when unmarked cars have called in a license plate check for a car that they are only following (no lights, no sirens) that turns out to be stolen.

Only recently, has the legislature even made it a crime to flee the police. Before it had to be worded under a generic title of "Obstruction of Governmental Administration" (a Class A misdemeanor which usually gets plead down), "Disorderly Conduct" (a violation - not even a crime), or worst of all "Fail to Comply With Lawful Order (a simple traffic infraction).

auditor4u2007

I can't tell you where I've seen it, but I have seen this device, that works like a remote controlled car, and is operated by the police car that is chasing a suspect in a high speed chase. The policeman advances this device under the suspects car, and the policeman pushes a button, which causes the device to emit some sort of signal that shuts down all electrical and computer activities of the car that it is under, causing it to slow and then stop dead in its tracks. I'd like to see that system developed and used.

Stupid Marxist

Nice idea, I will support it.

But too many bleeding-hearts would cry about the grenade

noms

I AGREE!!!! 100%

Roger N

The officer should have full permission to shoot the driver in the back of the head.
Only bad people run and they endanger everyone else around them.
Would you rather the bad guy die or some innocent crossing the street somewhere?
The are currently working on GPS tags that shoot out of the front of the patrol cars. This would work out great too.

KC V â„¢

Most agencies have very specific guidelines concerning pursuits. Those cases involving felonies are usually the exception to discontinuing a pursuit.

However, in those cases where the safety of the general public is at hand and outweigh the crime most agencies and officers will agree to terminate the pursuit.

Best wishes.

volleyballchick

Police risk their lives daily. That is a part of their job, and they are trained to handle situations such as chases.

As for the citizens, if they don't want to be hurt, then they shouldn't run from the cops. Why in the world would you want to add another charge to the list you are running from? It doesn't make any sense to me.

It makes me angry to see criminals suing officers because they were injured during a chase THAT THEY INITIATED! Basically, they are mad they got caught, and they are mad about getting hurt when they created the danger by fleeing an officer!

TarKettle

I think it's okay as long as the police stay sharp and know exactly what they're doing. That includes flashing their siron lights in congestion.

|â–’ retired â–’|

you'd think by now there'd be some technology available to make it easier to stop cars

i know at one time they experimented with that little deal that killed the electrical system of the car that's running

somebody somewhere has to have an idea that'll imobilize the car and keep things less dangerous

speedysundevil

personally, if someone runs from the police, they should be able to pursue... 9 times out of 10 if someone runs, they have something very large to hide. Now I will agree there is a danger with pursuits, but not pursuing, will just tell the criminals it is ok to commit crimes and so long as they run, take dangerous chances, and put the public at risk... police will not pursue. This will increase crime and still put the public at risk. The bottom line is in my opinion the public is just as much to blame for the hazard and level of danger in chases, as much as the one attempting to run from police. We are taught in drivers education, when we hear sirens and see flashing lights, we pull to the right, or remain at a stop if we are at an intersection (a.k.a do not proceed through) so that law enforcement and emergency vehicles have a route around where they will not have to guess where you are going to move to. The motoring public almost never does this, they keep driving, don't pull over right away, and will try to proceed through intersections to beat the emergency vehicles. Bottom line if the motoring public would be more vigilant, and pull over, they would be out of harms way because the one running from police would take the open lane and continue to get away with the least amount of effort.

bbasingal

Just about every police department has a pursuit policy. I believe that if officers are not allowed to pursue subjects then we will have given the keys to the city to the criminal element; I mean really...who runs in the first place? Grandma or Mr. Thug?

I think pursuits should be left to the officers best judgement. If there are many bystanders and pedestrians around, call off the chase, if traffic is light and its not like a blizzard out, I would go with the chase. If criminals realize that they can run and not be chased, it will just increase the # of people that commit crimes and try to get away with them.

tiny b

Anytime a criminal is being chased by police and a air patrol is also on them, the ground force should just quit.. then follow them in the air and give ground patrol the locations..

This could also be done with a satellite.. We have the technology and should use it..

truthspeaker10

The rule of thumb is they are to terminate pursuit unless the suspect poses a significant threat to the general public. I do not think that police stations should release their chase video's to the public, all it does is glorify a very dangerous situation, and could influence other police officers to make the wrong choice in a situation like that.

You need to remember that besides the cop and the criminal, there are dozens of innocent bystandards who are endangered in a high-speed pursuit.

Ben

Another STUPID POLICING POLICY practiced in far too many parts of the country.

But, I also do not have any qualms about using lethal force against anyone fleeing from the police who is not just running away for fear of being beaten to death by them. The chasing policy always places innocent lives at risk.

chuck_junior

Guidelines and policies for pursuits in most departments are very strict as it is. If it's known that there is a felony suspect behind the wheel but the pursuit itself is becoming too much of a threat to the public at large, ground units will discontinue....but that eye in the sky stays on them until they go to ground, and coordinates units around the suspect so that they can close in and make the arrest.

Common Sense

Out of the way, hopefully.

adnane

agree 100%

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: