|

Absolute Rotter
|
You most certainly do old girl, what the devil were those chaps at Johnson's thinking of anyway, no more tears! where's the fun in that. I add extra salt, gravel and broken glass to the servants shampoo and there are plenty of tears at their weekly hosing down I can tell you. The filthy guttersnipes. Tip top (Tears) |
|

Rosy Lee
|
That is disgraceful! Perhaps the forumla for this shampoo only works in the eyes. Did you put it in his eyes? That could be where you're going wrong. Drag him back up tot the Bathroom and have another bash!
The people answering above are the swine that work for Johnson's me thinks. Maybe a little frightened of legal action, I say go for it old gel. |
|

Sir Terrance DeCat.
|
My dear lady, young Justin needs to be saved, urgently. Quack remedies from Johnson's simply won't do.
You need to book him in for an operation to have his tear ducts removed, with the minimum of delay. While you're at it, his tongue could also be removed, as children should be seen and not heard. |
|

Lord Charles
|
You most certainly do. This is clearly covered by the Trade Descriptions Act. I had a similar experience whilst recently trying to have my wicked way with a young lady wearing so called 'no-run stockings'.........you can probably guess the rest! |
|

Mr.Boombastic Mungbean
 |
Lady F, I feel it may have been an error on your part. This product is obviously for the eyelash hair, as it states 'no more tears' and not the hair on ones head. Try again but this time shampoo his eyelashes. As for Johnsons HQ, I actually own the building, they have 2923 members of staff there. All with families, mortgages and loans etc. I have informed them, that due to their rude attitude towards you, I will be burning the building down at 8am tomorrow morning, so it darn well better be empty. |
|

armychick_2001
 |
Be sure to save the offending bottle of shampoo as evidence. And file your suit in California. |
|

Duchess of Chutney
 |
My dear, tis blatantly obvious that you are not to blame - clearly your nephew is possessed by the devil. Having fits, crying and screaming, speaking in tongues no doubt - I would hasten to call the priest and have him sprinkle a little holy water over said child. Hopefully the demon will then desist or he will have to perform a full exorcism. Apparently there were over a thousand cases of infant possession due to Johnson's shampoo last year. Pip Pip! |
|

The End
|
now I know the reason there are so many dead lawyer jokes!
you picked a tough room Lady Felicity ....lol |
|

Gone for good...
|
Jolly good show... Not a bad old sort for a lady!
Keep up the good work...
Pip Pip! |
|

MOLEY FOLDY
|
I have days like this I was earlier told how to spell properly by a Yank and still they see no irony in that at all. |
|

Lord Faversham-Shaftsworthy
 |
My dear Lady P. i had a similar problem with a product purchased for great aunt Agatha,(112) she was feeling down after having no replies on dating direct even though she was pictured in her thong and basque ?
the product which clearly stated "will help to remove the sign of aging" and "greatly reduces lines and wrinkles" had no effect, the poor old boot still looks like a ruddy Shar Pei bless her.
legal action is the only way my dear ?
tally ho x |
|

tedrick93
 |
I don't understand why dragging him into the bathroom and washing his hair should calm him, but I doubt seriously you could hold the manufacturer responsible because it didn't work. |
|

Erm
|
What was your interpretation of 'no tears formula'? That the shampoo, when used, created no tears? or that the shampoo, when used, will stop a crying child from crying?
Apply the reasonable man test. Will a resaonable person think that the shampoo is capable of making a child stop crying?
A more logical and sensible interpretation seems to be that the shampoo, when used, will not tear a child when it got into the eyes. |
|

Tina Marie
|
Your a moron, children should not be treated this way. Take him home and don't take care of him anymore. |
|

T-Max
|
Well the child was crying in the first place. Are you nuts that a shampoo will make him stop crying?j!!! |
|

lcmcpa
 |
If you actually called the company about this they are probably still laughing at you. They have done nothing wrong. A spoiled brat crying is not any of their concern. Why in the world would you shampoo an already upset spoiled brat? I don't think your nephew should be left alone with you again. |
|

marika
 |
go on all forum of mothers, or babies, children, and pregnancies, ... some forums discusse health issues, try to find out how many parents are dealing with "a no tear champoo" that does not work ! and then try to see if the kids had really problems after using this champoo, for your nefew, beside criying, did he have more trouble seeing ?
but do you really believe you can drag a huge company like johnson & johnson, because a bratt screamed louder after you have washed his hair wiht that champoo ? think, about the lawyer you are about to hire... who is going to pay, the court fees ? look if it is worth the case... good luck |
|

|
|
|