Is George Bush any different from a serial killer?

eawolfpack04

no he's not. but he would probably be considered a mass murderer. serial killer follow different rules kinda than what he has done.

Valkanas

Serial killers are smarter.

dallas

not to you. you would just love that wouldn't you? pathetic.

Miami Rox

No....Not really...Exept for the fact that a serial killer is a lot nicer than Bush is...

michael a

I don't know if serial killer is right term to use ,but I can't help but wonder what really separates President Bush from Saddam Hussein. In fact our country is mired in so much cover up while we are pointing our finger's at the other person telling them how they should do thing's. Take a look at 35 years ago when our very country was dropping Agent Orange on our troop's in Vietnam and the death's caused from this and our country is still denying the cancer and death's were caused by this Agent Orange. Now take a look at the very cover up going on today,where our military lied and covered up the true fact's of former football player Pat Tillman. Yet we say Saddam was wrong and we are right,but we aren't right. In my eyes President Bush is responsible for over 3,000 death's of our troops in Iraq,but may you get a good night's rest tonight Mister President.

mark j

Yes, they are completely opposite. If I have to explain this to you, then obviously there is something wrong with the way you think.

quelisto

Yes, most serial killers are actually intelligent.

Alan S

serial killers know their victims and are up close and personal when they die. To GWB the fine young Americans that die are just numbers on a page.
So yes there is a difference, GWB is way colder.

Answerman

Yes, Bush is a mass murderer, that is differnent then a cerial killer.

chamuka18

well not exactly cause some serial killers are smarter

a bush family member

No. LIBERATING IRAQ SAVED LIVES
The link is to a Liberal English newspaper.

The Iraq War stopped hundreds of thousands of people from dying due to U.N. Santions.

Even by the year 2000, a half of million children died. The real numbers of Saddam related deaths are even higher since Iraq was not attacked until three years later.

2000:
"Half a million children have died in Iraq since UN sanctions were imposed - most enthusiastically by Britain and the US. Three UN officials have resigned in despair. Meanwhile, bombing of Iraq continues almost daily. John Pilger investigates " http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,232986,00.html

yes, give me a serial killer any day....

michmounty

That is a heated topic.

In my mind, Bush's decision has cost LOTS of lives. So if you want to say that he is a serial killer, that is your choice. However, the jury is still out on if the number of lives he cost, is more or less than the number that would have died if it weren't for his decision. That is almost impossible to ever know.

Let's not forget that Bill Clinton also bombed Iraq. Hillary felt he was a GRAVE danger to the world before the Iraq war. It was almost unanomous that we should get rid of Saddam ASAP at the time.

Why rewrite history and blame everything on GWB? He has some fault, but not all of it. Has he made mistakes, yes, but we will never know if the world is safer because of his decisions or more dangerous. People, media, government can only make guesses... often based on biases.

We are looking at this situation while it is going on. We wont have the clear picture for another 15 years... then the truth of our time will come out and the perspectives will be more clear by looking at it 100 miles above. There will be no reason to make politically bias claims at that point. We will see how Iraq is, and we will evaluate for ourselves if it was a good idea to dethrone Saddam, or it was a bad idea.

Reported for insulting my belief

Yes, Congress approved the war.

mike b

you must be a lib

ksgrl_86

In what respect?? Granted the "war" should have been over a long time ago. But the fact that they would follow our men and women back. Would you want a terrorist to blow up your workplace or your house, because they came back this way?
Our men and women may be dying, but they are keeping us safe. Look at it this way, we may have unfortunately lost 3,000 lives, but in Vietnam, the total was 58,000.
I think we are better off now, we are pulling out in the next year (hopefully) and Bush won't be in office much longer, and you can put someone you believe will handle things better.
It's all a matter of opinion. I think that he's gotten in to deep and he doesn't know what he's doing anymore...but to call him a serial killer...is a lil extreme.

mark k

you need to get out more often! it really shows!!

James

What kind of question is that?
Someone shouldn't let idiots ask dumb questions..
sorry but really....
sad

G-MAN

If you want to call President Kennedy,President Johnson or any other President that sent someone off to war than I guess we should classify them all as Killers along with all of the congressmen and women and senators that went along with it.The Million who died in WWI the million that died in WWII the thousands that Died in Korea the 58000 that died in Vietnam and the 70000 that committed suicide after Vietnam,then they are all KILLERS.

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: