Most of the 9-11 terrorists wre from Saudi Arabia, as is Bin Laden. Why are we not at war with S.A.?

goodyisback2010

because the Bush family and the Bin Laden family are actually friends we just went to war to appease the American population, and so our government decided the best thing to do would be to pretend like we were going after Osama Bin Laden but really we would go after the oil in Iraq like we did when Bush's father was the president

britsurfer1

The US (specifically bush) has a lot of dealings with the Saudi's as a result they would never ruin that relationship.

lynda_is

OIL!

Valerie

The Saudi Arabian government has their own hands full fighting terrorist in their own country. Yes, there are terrorist in Saudi Arabia but it makes no sense for us to go to war there when the government is already fighting them.

If you can remember back to 9/11 Pres Bush said our war was against terrorist and the countries that protect them.

Jimmy P

Saudi Arabia is friendly to us, and we need their oil.

The war in Iraq was meant to create a regime change, we already have a regime friendly to us in S.A.

The Mick "7"

It's the organization we're after not the country they came from.

scififed

oil.

uncleslam111

Saudi Arabia has bought and paid for all the White House and Congressional influence it needs. This is why the recently released 9-11 report contains no mention of the secret documentation of Saudi Arabian complicity in the terrorism that took 3,000 American lives. As Senator Shelby noted on PBS NewsHour recently (he has read the secret report), 93% of the blanked out pages, and specifically those on Saudi sponsorship of terrorism against America and other nations, is a "con man's" effort to avoid "embarrassment." As the families of the 9-11 victims have said, "we need to know." The US ruling circles preferred to ignore the Saudi hatred as long as they could share in the Saudi spoils. Now the lower and middle class soldiers are paying in blood to maintain the links between the US's upper classes, the Saudi ruling family, and oil money.

During the Clinton Administration; The CIA was so neutered that it was incapable of penetrating the numerous organizations such as the Islamic Brotherhood and other predecessors, affiliates, and allies of al Qaeda.
We can't continue to have it all in the USA; cheap gas and oil, while sticking our heads in the sand when it comes to Saudi sponsored hate factories which turn out demented jihadists to commit acts of terrorism like 9/11, and thinking that somehow democracy is the answer to all of the problems just like we have funded in the name of fighting communism over the years. 9/11 is only the largest expression of the terrorists' hatred for us, but it is certainly not the last. If we continue our present policies of overlooking Saudi complicity in nurturing these organizations for the sake of the oil business then we should only expect further attacks on our soil and abroad.
Saudi Arabia is more and more an irrational state. a place that spawns global terrorism even as it succumbs to an ancient and deeply seated isolationism, a kingdom led by a royal family that can?t get out of the way of its own greed. Is this the fulcrum we want the global economy to balance on??

To all of you simpletons blaming Bush,this is not a republican nor a democratic issue, there has been a bi-partisan sale of our govt since the end of WW2 Every administration since FDR, who have turned the other cheek in order to maintain the flow of cheap oil into the USA.. money flows from the Saudis and the oil industry into political coffers on both sides of the aisle, for presidential, congressional and senate races, and former administration officials' jobs (remember Kissinger excused himself from the 9/11 commission rather than identify his clients) .Being partisan has nothing to do with it, buying favors has everything to do with it.

The Bushes and Chaney own oil wells in Kuwait.
when the then president Bush went into the gulf war he was protecting his oil wells. He who has the oil rules the world.
To have the oil wells in Iraq would be a real security move.
They already are friends with the saudis, see no reason to over take them. Besides they are best friends.
They can put a missle in someones pocket, they know where Ben Laudin is. To capture him would end the reason for the war.
It is all about the oil.

MornGloryHM

Bin Laden might be from Saudi Arabia, but that's not the country that hid him. That would be Afghanistan, I think. But we are in Iraq as an indirect result of 9-11, not a direct result. Saddam appeared to be threatening to become a terrorist, so we got rid of him. I think we did a good thing for his people and for the rest of the world. We should have done it a decade ago. But we as a nation weren't strong enough psychologically to do it then. 9-11 made us strong enough to do it now.

MSJP

That's an easy question to answer...

We are not at War with Saudi Arabia because the Royal Family and the Bin Laden Family have very close ties, with the Bush Family.

If you remember, on September 11th, 2001, after all Air Traffic was grounded, there was only One plane allowed in the air (Besides our Military Jets) and that plane contained the Bin Laden Family and some members of the Saudi Royal Family.

Will

As far as we know Al Qeada has no support from Saudi Arabia.

David W

Your question is invalid.
It's not yet common knowledge, but when the truth is fully in the open it will be.
There were no hijackers, and no large jets involved in 9/11 It's all a complete hoax, and most people have been fooled by it.
No doubt most readers will find this statement alarming. The truth often is.
The sites listed below contain sufficient detail to get you on track.
The information has been debated by the entire 9/11 truth movement, and has only recently been made available to the general public.
You can be one of the first to get in on the truth.
Take a look at the sites below.
If you already well versed in 9/11 truth, then go to the second site, or if this is your introduction, read both. Won't take long

cruzan

Simply put, SA doesn't fund or protect them.

Aleksandr

The Saudi royal family is very large... I've heard some talk about their being an anti-American separatist movement... but for the most part they love our money and I think part of invading Iraq may have been their idea... or at least that it was up to their approval. they have a lot of economic power in the U.S.

Fighting Saudi Arabia would have been difficult... they have so much money they could raise an army fast, they could buy the weapons from our own corporations, and would have done so before the attack if it was their intention to start a war.

Proud to be an AMERICAN

Hitler was born in Austria, yet we fought Germany. Go figure.

Jesi

We don't need to attack them to get their oil.

If the UN places an embargo on Saudi Arabia we'll discover the pilots of the hijacked planes were elite SA commando pilots. Then we'll go in and free the people from the shackles of their oppressive benevolent despot and create a new democracy.

But now we get their oil, so democracy isn't important.

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: