 
|
greybluehoney
|
I believe that when proven all killers, serial killers, paedophiles , and husband/wife abusers should be put to death. An eye for an eye. Other crimes such as theft should be dealt with in a different manner. Imprisonment, but made to work 16 hours a day to pay for their own keep in prison. Why the hell should I have to be taxed to keep them warm, dry and fed, when I work my *** off to keep my kids warm, fed and dry. Do they have to pay for medication, dental, haircuts, doctors, food, heat, hydro, clothes and basic necessities? BECAUSE I DO AND I HAVE TO PAY TAXES TO KEEP THEIR SORRY ASSES. Make them work 16 hours a day to keep them selves in prison. Not the silly minor jobs they get them to do either. Make them work for their life. I have had many family members who have spent time in jail and it is a fu##ing joke. |
|
rage997
|
No. If only one innocent person is killed for every 50,000 guilty (and that's hugely optimistic), it would be too many!
I say make prisons profitable. Make prisoners work their tattooed asses off. They should essentially be slaves! |
|
Todd T
 |
No. Fallibility in the system means too many innocent people would be executed before exoneration. Moreover, if one really believes in punishment, life in a tiny cell is far worse. The cost factor to the taxpayer is always an issue, but overall, the death penalty should remain banned. |
|
C B
|
Hang 'em high!
Murders and alike deserve such a fate. Plus, those sentenced to death have a zero rate of recidivism after they are put to death. |
|
psych_78
 |
I think so!! But only should be used if there is without a doubt the person is guilty!! But then again I wonder if the death penalty is a reward rather than a punishment, because for me if I were ever to be convicted of a crime and I had the choice of the death penalty or life in prison (or even 20 years) I would choose the death penalty! Obviously I know you can't choose, but my point is i'd rather be dead then spend much of my life in prison!! |
|
MissTee
|
good question only a question for people with intellegience...
even though i think some people dont deserve to live....its a hard tricky one as one to be person can be given a unfair judgement to loose their life...
so i have to say no for the fact those who judge are human and h uman are not always right in judgement....
i do think there should be a harsher punishement other then sitting the rest of there life in jail living off money we work for everyday to eat sleep and ****...like normal |
|
chris w
 |
bloody el govnor.................... |
|
G.T
|
yeah they should feed them spam butties until there stomachs explode and then let some hungry dogs eat the content of there stomachs while everyone sits about getting p**d and eating a pepperami! (the fire stick variety)
Emmie has an attitude dont you lass? |
|
Hannah
 |
Thats a bazzare question, I just wrote an essay for this in my English class, I don't think so because if they go to jail then they hae to think about what they did for the rest of their life... thats deep. |
|
Stevie G
|
Is it any wonder we have ruling classes making all our minds up for us when these are the answers?
Should we bring back the death penatly? FU*K OFF!
While you're at it P*SS OFF to America you freaks!
Dude? WTF!!! DUDE??? Are you a low level mentally ill American? And who's WE.....you are all alone Moron. Thanks for taking notice of me though...I must have " hit a nerve".
................................
Fine Humour me, but why are you trying to sound like an American? "DUDE" and biggin' up the Death Penatly, that's just plain f**kin' wrong mate! Death Penalty brought back to the UK? you're either mental a kid or stoned off your nut! |
|
jaz
|
no,
its just not right.
sickos |
|
CARLA G
|
yes with d.n.a catching criminals there is little chance of them executing the wrong person like in the past life for a life and kill the kiddie fiddlers |
|
on the wagon
|
i love a good lynching |
|
Grington
|
There are probably some offenders who deserve to die for their crimes, but the UK laws, courts and processes are so flawed and inefficient that there would be mistakes made, so I would have to say no - unless someone can come up with a way of ensuring the people found guilty really are guilty.
It would still make more sense than ASBOs though. |
|
John A
|
I was under the impression that a court could still enforce the death penalty for treason. If this is the case, I would like to nominate Mr Tony Blair for causing the unnecessary and unjustified deaths of British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't think it would be a good idea to allow mobile phones with video facilities into the proceedings, just a simply photo of the duplicitous traitor with a broken neck would suffice. |
|
RIZ
|
no yes |
|
rory r
|
yes |
|
you suck
 |
why not? |
|
mike-from-spain
|
no |
|
snuffylover4
 |
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!... |
|
xialou1
|
i waited for an as-s-hole like you to take me to level 4 thanx,,,,
learn some compassion or life will keep kicking you in the teeth,,,,, |
|
ella915824
|
Freedom of speech! Haven`t they passed a bill against that one? |
|
Googlypants
|
Only if loving you is a major crime baby! |
|
warr31
|
the death penalty should be brought back for mass murderers and rapists everywhere. why use our money to keep them alive in luxury in jail, when those funds could be used by charities for the homeless, orphanages, or to fund crisis centres for treating their countless victims? |
|
slew
|
I'm for the Death penalty. I think there are a lot of people who are a waste of life. I support it to make that statement to those people rather than as punishment.
To warn the English, Illinois and Texas has both been caught executing an innocent man. If you start bringing it back, make sure its done right, rather than allowing hate mongering yahoos to take over the scene. |
|
keny
|
no the police can`t be trusted .They are under pressure from government targets and expected to get a certain amount of convictions ,Its not unknown for them to tamper with evidence .It`s in the news today that a man has had to be released after serving 14years for a murder he well may not have done .it came out that the police had withheld evidence ,The judge had allowed inadmissible evidence and the verdict was unsafe (They usually only rule unsafe ,so that they are not liable for compo) Any one could be at the wrong place at the wrong time and get blamed for a crime they didn`t do,it can and does happen more than people realise i don`t agree with capital punishment ,but what right has anyone got to sentence a person to death if theres the smallest chance he/she could be innocent .DNA is often irrelevant and tests due to human error not always reliable
capital punishment was abolished years ago as there were more reasons to stop it than there were for it to be allowed |
|
Audio Visual master
|
Yeh start with the cricket team |
|
im2jaded04
|
Yes. |
|
NutstersChick
|
it would b contrary 2 the Humans Rights Act, so unless we back away from Europe that seems very very unlikely.
as any1 can c right now, the deterrent of prison doesn't seem 2 b working, it could b a good idea 2 show by example.
if u kill, u stand a chance of being killed urself.
definitely 4 paedophiles and serial rapists.
some people can't b fixed. |
|
f f
|
No. The person suffers much longer behind bars. |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
