Should women be identified.?

kel

Should go further she should be identified. She should be put on trial for perjury, wasting police time, perverting the course of justice.

FIONA S

yes if we want equality we should be named. at least the jury should have known about her history.

kitty-mama

Yes, she should be identified by name, location and a recent photo. She is NOT a victim, her identity needing to be kept secret. She is a CRIMINAL for destroying the lives of men innocent of the crime she accused them of. Her face should be all over the news just like any criminal. Not only has this sicko ruined the lives of these men and their families, but she made it that much harder for a TRUE victim to come forward for fear of not being believed.

Diane

Yes she should

Steven S

I do think she should be identified! She shouldn't be allowed to do this!

Mike Cameron

Yes

paulisfree04

yes she should be in a civil law suit for false inprisonment and she should have to serve 6 years

killerlegend2u

she should be indentified to keep ppl safe from those acusation.

Chuck M

Given the facts, as you stated them, with no other factors to consider.....Yes. She is a criminal, and criminals should be identified for the general public.

This, That & such

Yes !

Mizz B

Yes she should, and she should serve double the time he did.

Them women f*ck it up for the real victims of rape and it's about time they were punished properly for it.

Princess415

Of course she should be named, the lying little b*tch. She should not only be named but she should be put away for the same amount of time that the poor innocent guy had to languish in prison. An eye for an eye!

kezz

YES!YES!YES!

yes she should be named and imprisoned and serve the same sentence.

guernsey_donkey2

Too true. Nasty crime, but just being accused can ruin a fella.

Lying about such a crime is nasty and vicious.

Psycho Dave

yes and no she should be shamed stoned but it isn't the way here in England the person in the wrong has all the rights the rules stink but does any one do any thing about it no look at who you vote for and study carefully there is a party moving fast up the ladder and guess who _ _ _ Dave

rowdy

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. Also, men accused of rape should not be named until convicted.

melas

NAMED AND SHAMED

lisa h

yes definetly

CHRIS S

yes she should be named

davespnr

If she was named and then really raped, no-one would believe her. I agree that it is diabolical what she did though.

michael k

Women who are raped should not be named.Women who make false accusations should.Simple.

Effie

no, but she should be thorwn in jail for 30 years, ten year for each year that guy had to suffer in there

Danger Mouse

If they name her then she will instantly become a target of a REAL rapist.
What she has done is very wrong and I feel for the men she accused.
However, she needs psychiatric help, not actually raping, which may well happen if you name her.

Dry Dreamer

If, as you say she has done this six time's then she is in need of urgent psychiatric treatment and as such is entitled to anonymity

Tough to answer. But yes she should be identified in a case of repeated claims. Protecting rape victims from character assasination is important too.

mikefitzhistorian

This is a very difficult question to answer. In principle I feel that the real crime was the incompetence of the police and the courts in not realising that the woman concerned was a serial liar. It is difficult enough to get women to come forward after they have been raped and also very hard to secure a conviction in court. Rape is a traumatic experience for women and I lean, with extreme reluctance, to the view that anonymity should still be preserved as the lesser of two evils.

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: