Home     Links     Contact Us     Bookmark  
 
   Homepage      News      Legal Forum      Dictionary  
Home : Legal Forum : Law & Ethics

What is MORAL but Illegal? AND what is NOT moral but LEGAL?
Find answers to your legal question.





What is MORAL but Illegal? AND what is NOT moral but LEGAL?

Have you ever thought of some things that you view ARE moral but the law has them illegal? AND/OR can you think of anything that is NOT moral but the law has it has legal??? Any thoughts would be great!!


    




kathbiralibaby
Determining legality is certainly easier thn determining morality. It would depend highly on the definition (sense of) morality. Take for instance, the death penalty, It can be legal but the verdict is still out on morality, the same can be said for euthanasia, (we do it daily for animals) but the legality for humans questions the morality of it. Think of the morality of suicide, religion makes it immoral. Outside of religion's view is it moral? immoral? amoral? Regardless of your personal views it remains illegal.


Mongo
Rating
Legal, but not moral - abortion


Fook you
if your a fireman/MFR which is like an EMT but emt's go to school longer there are some things you cant do to save a life(for exapmle eppie pens or take blood sugar) because everyone is sue happy.


Just_gone
Rating
1) Medical marijuana
2) The Patriot Act


GreenBeansRevenge
moral but illegal: truth sometimes-understanding two sides of the coin in planet of the apes.

legal but immoral: Manipulation


bregweidd
morality and legality have little to do with each other

morality has to do simply with right/wrong

legality is what a bunch of people decide is legal/illegal - so if they are immoral (what?! immoral politicians???) . . .


Richard F
Rating
I am so glad you are aware of the distinction. The list in both categories is long and if more people were aware, laws would be better and the things people lobby in favor of would be superior.


Rеdisca
Moral but illegal -- for a lawyer to act as a mediator for unrepresented parties (in most instances)

Not moral but legal -- disrespecting one's parents; spying on someone; publishing extremely damaging but true information about someone (in most US jurisdictions); abortion.


Judge Judy of Y/A
Smoking marijuana is moral (in my opinion) but not legal.

Cheating on your spouse is not moral but legal.


wadacious
Rating
Smoking weed - sodomy


brian e
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXNbhh2R6uc


ellipse4
Rating
legal but not moral - firing someone, denying someone housing, denying someone medical care, denying someone inheritance rights and denying someone hospital visitation rights just because they are a GLBT person

legal but not moral - any and all hate speech

moral but illegal - allowing gay people to get married


Common Sense
The second question is easier than the first. Examples of Immoral but Legal:
abortion;
ACLU persecution of Christian values in our society;
assisted suicide (in WA);
politicians making comments detrimental to our troops welfare and morale (regardless of political party or position);
ambulance-chasing lawyers filing frivolous lawsuits due to people's shirking personal responsibility;
reverse discrimination against white males;
taking advantage of someone's generosity;
claiming entitlement to the government taking care of your every need;


Things that are morally right, but illegal:
(as it stands now) instilling Christian values in our schools & government;
corporal punishment


amanda
a man was burgling a house, he slipped and he suedthe guys house that he was stealing from.

also the story where there was that woman whos husband ended her life by pulling the plug on her life support ??does anyone no whut im on bout?

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Bush-wont-let-husband-pull-plug/2005/03/21/1111253959896.html
theres a link that explains it..


Jynn
smoking pot medicinally is moral, but not legal. outsourcing American jobs is legal, but not moral


xcongoneout
Same thing as what is typed below.

For all the brutality, deprivation and misery of slavery, the
slave was the protected property of another. Owners bought Slaves as an investment, and thus had an interest in keeping them alive and seeing that they reproduced. The lessee, on the other hand, had no such protection. If they died of malnutrition or disease, they were simply replaced, at no cost to the leaser, by a new convict. The life of the convict was expendable. As the system of convict lease expanded from a local system to a state and multi-state system, the impersonality and brutality of the system increased exponentially. The labor required of convicts also changed as the South struggled to industrialize during reconstruction, and later as it became the main producer of many high demand raw goods, such as turpentine, at the beginning of the First World War. Chain gang labor replaced plantation labor for the majority of convicts; they were put to work mining coal, tapping turpentine and laying railroad. The free labor of Blacks because of the convict lease program was the driving force behind the economic growth of the South after emancipation just as it had always been.

Convict lease was highly profitable. Not only did it provide an unlimited source of free labor to any and all Southern industry, thus making big money for the owners of such industry, Convict Leasing was profitable in and of itself. In much that same way that private contracts work today, that State only leased its convicts to one or two well connected brokers. “The exclusive right to lease state convicts quickly became Mississippi’s most prized political contract. ” These Brokers served as middlemen. They leased convicts from the state under contract, and then sub-leased them as worker for a higher price. Oshinsky provides the example of Colonel Jones S. Hamilton, who won the contract for Mississippi’s convicts in 1876. He leased them from the state for $1.10 a month, but instead of working them himself, he placed an ad in the newspaper and sub-leased them for $9 month to any interested party.

"From a business stand point, the subleasing was ideal, it plugged the major weaknesses of the old system: the high fixed cost of labor. Under the sublease, and employer was not stuck with a set number of prisoners over a long period of time. He did not have to feed, clothe and guard them when there was little work to be done. He could now lease convicts according to his specific, or season needs."

With the convict lease system an employer could lease convicts only when they needed them. Consequently, the demand for convicts varied according to the production seasons. And so too, did the crime rate. Demand for convicts varied by season and the number of arrest of Blacks varied according to the demand for convicts. Thus planting season, or the start of a major public works project would be accompanied by a so called “crime wave,” resulting in the mass arrest of as many Blacks as were needed to fill the ranks.

In Tallahassee, for example, Leon County officials made a deal to lease all of their convicts to the Putnam Lumber company the result was predictable, a minor “crime wave” hit Leon County. Vagrancy arrests shot up by almost 800 percent in the seven months following the Putnam Lumber deal.

These “crime waves,” did not actually see any increase in the number of crimes, only an increase in the number of arrests from petty crimes of all sorts. They were accompanied, as they are today, by much hype and propaganda, aimed at stoking the fire of fear and anger that white society felt toward the “Black criminal.” Though the vast majority of convicts were men, because they best fulfilled the market demand for manual labor, women and children where also caught in the fray.

Oshinsky gives a powerful example of the co-dependent relationship between industry and “crime.”

"A journalist in 1907 described an all-too-common arrangement between a local sheriff and a turpentine operator in desperate need of men. ‘Together’ he wrote, ‘they made up a list of some eight *****’s known to both as good husky fellows, capable of a fair days’ work.’ The sheriff was promised five dollars plus expenses for each ***** he ‘landed.’ Within three weeks, he had arrested all eighty of them on various petty charges—gambling, disorderly conduct, assault, and the like. The larger part of the list was gathered with a dragnet at Saturday-night shindies, and hailed to the local justice, who was in on the game.’"

The system of convict lease, rooted in racist laws and made possible by the collusion of law makers, law enforcement, and local industry, was so profitable that it persisted for many years despite rising disgust and opposition on the part of the populous. The South was rebuilt through an enormous publics works effort, made reality in the hands of convicts. The railroads were laid, the coal minded, and the turpentine tapped. As the nation geared up for World War I, all of the raw materials necessary were supplied by corporations that relied on convict labor to do the deadly work without pay.

While it is difficult to pinpoint the end of convict leasing, it certainly experienced substantial decline because of the confluence of economic and moral concerns. Convict lease came under fire from humanitarians who exposed the death, disease and cruelty that dominated the system. As resistance to the system grew, it also became economically less viable. Oregon was the first state to abolish convict lease. As the economy changed and the moral outrage mounted it was gradually abolished on a state level Alabama was the last state to make convict leasing illegal in 1928. This end date is deceptive however, because when states abolished convict lease, it only applied to convicts in state penitentiaries, not those in county jails.

In 1923 Florida ended the Convict lease system after the brutal (though not uncommon) death of convict Martin Talbert “became front page news across the country. ” Like elsewhere, the abolition of convict lease in Florida did little to change the system, because with state convicts off limits, the populations of county jails simply expanded to fill the void. In Florida the turpentine industry fueled the demand for convicts. So the “end” of convict lease was not 1923, but rather convict lease declined slowly, along with the demand for turpentine, after the end of World War II.


[edit] Profitability
The state profited directly from the leasing of their convicts to a “Broker” who today would be called a private contractor.
The American private companies and corporations profited immensely because they had a reliable source of unpaid labor.
In much the same ways as slavery, the bodies of the convicts were “mined,” not just for their labor but for every potentially profitable element. In 1871, the convicts of the state of Tennessee were contracted out to a single man, Thomas O’Conner, a professional card gambler, with some important political connections. These convicts were put to work across the state mining coal and laying train tracks. “Each morning their urine was collected and sold to local tanneries by the barrel. When they died, their unclaimed bodies were purchased by the Medical School at Nashville for the students to practice on. ”

[edit] The dual system of sharecropping and convict lease
The convict lease system, which re-instituted de-facto slavery under a new name processed large numbers of recently freed blacks and their offspring born to “freedom”. The vast majority of prisoners who were leased out died. In the history of convict lease in Mississippi, no convict leased to the chain gang ever lived more than seven years. The remaining free Black population was processed through the complementary and parallel system of sharecropping.

Much has been written about how sharecropping, also called debt-peonage, re-enslaved many newly freed Blacks. The passage of the Black Codes made it illegal for an ex-slave to be unemployed. The result was that unemployed Blacks were either to sent to prison, and then put to work through the Convict lease system, or in an attempt to avoid prison, went to work anywhere they could. Thus, may Blacks sought employment doing plantation labor, often on the same farm they had previously worked as slaves. The function and conditions of Sharecrop Farming are widely understood, so I will attempt only a rough summary here.

Sharecrop farmers were loaned a plot of land to work, and in exchange owed the owner a share of the crop at the end of the season. Often the planter’s share was 1/3, though sometime it was much higher. The sharecropper was required to purchase seed, tools and fertilizer, as well as food and clothing, on credit at the plantation store. When the harvest came, the sharecrop farmer would harvest the whole crop and sell his or her portion to the planter at a fixed price. By the time all the debts owed and proceeds made were tallied up the farmer was lucky to break even. The planter set the price of the crop, and all the books were kept and tallied by the planter, such that there was plenty of opportunity to fudge the books, guaranteeing that the sharecropper never made any profit.

In The Yazoo River Congressman Frank E. Smith recounted the story of a shrewd tenant who is told on Settlement day that his cotton proceeds had exactly equaled his debts:

TENANT: Then I don’t owe you nuthin, Cap’m?
PLANTER: No, you don’t owe me a cent.
TENANT: An’ you don’t owe me nuthin'?
PLANTER: You saw the books.
TENANT: Then what’s I gonna do with them two bales I ain’t done hauled in yet?
PLANTER: Well, what do you know! Just look at that! Here’s two pages stuck together. I’ll have to add this whole account up again.
The scene is funny but sadly true. Often planters were not even that generous, and if it was desired that a sharecropper stay on another season, the books could easily be made to come out with him in debt. Thus the sharecropper was often forced to continue working on the same plantation because of a supposed debt. If the most commonly understood attribute of slavery is that one can be bought and sold, sharecroppers were indeed re-enslaved, as they were sometimes “sold” to another planter willing to pay the amount of their debt. Together Convict Lease and Sharecrop Farming ensured that the majority of Blacks remained in slavery, either because of a fabricated debt, or as punishment for a petty crime. Convict Lease, and Sharecrop Farming were two halves of the same system, a system that returned the majority of Black American’s to slavery and plantation labor within months of their supposed emancipation





 Enter Your Message or Comment


User Name:  
User Email:   
Post a comment:




Legal Discussion Forum

 Accused of stealing $60 worth of gas...what the worse that can happen?
An officer called my house telling me how my boyfriend told him that I stole gas yesterday morning (and of course I'm pissed). Anyway it was 6o dollars worth and my boyfriend told him he would ...


 Boyfriend in jail for posession of marijuana? Plz Help.?
My boyfriend is in jail for posession of marijuana..he was taken in on Thursday. It was a small amount but he is being charged with posession with intent to sell. His court date is monday and i'...


 Is torturing terrorists to give information ethical?
During the republican debates the candidates were asked what they would do if a group of terrorists were captured, if they would endorse torturing them to get more infomation. Is this ethical? I am ...


 Do narcs have to tell you they are narcs if asked?
hey i was wondering is a (marijuana) narc required to tell you that they are associated with law enforcement if asked....my friend says they have to but i think hes full of shi t....anyone know? ...


 Should there be a pedophile register?
yes or no?...


 Is limewire illegal?..........?

Additional Details
i just want to know b4 i do it.
what if i check that box that says only allow me to download music the copyright holder will allow me to?...


 What are your views on abortion?
Do you believe it to be wrong or right. When do you think it should be allowed if at ...


 What would you do?
what would you do if you saw a friend stealing something off a mutual friend? neither the victim of the perpetrator know that I saw this, but I feel he shouldn't get away with what he's ...


 If I live with some, do i have rights to their property?
My friends dad has some woman living with him (g/f). What rights does she have to the house he shared with his deceased wife??
Additional Details
Hi, UK & no my friends not a ...


 .I have made a will leaving my house and money to my lover will my wife and daughter have any claims?
...


 Are you required by the Constitution to have a driver's license in order to drive on public roads?
I have wondered before if you really need the approval/permission of the government/state in order to drive a privately owned vehicle on public roadways. I have found several references both in S...


 "If" the Government banned guns would you turn yours over?
...


 Do you think the Americans have the right to jail a harmless UK computer nerd Gary McKinnon?
Gary McKinnon was arrested in 2002 following charges by U.S. prosecutors that he illegally accessed 97 government computers -- including Pentagon, U.S. army, navy and NASA systems --I do not believe ...


 Should the gov't legalize marijuana?
With the US economy in a recession, do you think it's a good idea for the gov't to legalize marijuana? I can see pros and cons of legalizing, but do you think taxing it will benefit the ...


 Vick made a plea bargain with federal prosecutors, now county prosecutors want him. Is it double jeopardy?
...


 What is the law regarding pay when working christmas eve?
am sure if u work christmas eve past a certain time u are supposed to be paid more?
Additional Details
i know its not a bank hol - just thought u got paid extra if u worked past a ...


 Can I sue my Husband's parents for having him?
Get me my attorney....


 Why do grocery stores throw out old food and not give it to the poor?

Additional Details
The food is not spoiled people. My sister worked in a grocrey store and she told me that even non perishable goods are thrown out after 3 months cuz the companies ...


 I got a ticket and...?
well its been about 6 months since i got this ticket and it didnt have a fine to pay it just said court it was for driving trough someones yard ( didn't even leave a mark just flattened grass) ...


 Do you believe there should ever be times when Freedom of Expression should be limited?
What do you think?...




Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Wiki Law 3k Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - Trusted legal information for you.
Archive: Forum  |  Forum  |  Forum  |  Links
0.034