 
|
Oracle
 |
What evidence?
If evidence did exist he would already be impeached.
How does a high school get evidence that adults dont have? |
|
gyrene71
|
He hasn't been impeached because he hasn't committed any impeachable offenses, unlike his predecessor, Bubba Clinton. He WAS impeached and got away by the skin of his teeth. |
|
sweetlilwoodsby19
 |
Why should I give you a top shape military answer, when this is obviously a top shape military question to begin with.
Just because you don't like Bush is not a good enough reason to impeach him! |
|
Farly the Seer
|
Oh, you ASSURE us. Great, let's take your word for it. Well, if we're going to have an intellectual discussion on unfounded assurances, let me say this. I assure you that the President has not committed an impeachable offense.
Do you think that the raving, Bush-hating, mouth-foaming liberals in Congress would not bang the drums incessantly for impeachment if they had even one tiny hint of an impeachable action?!
There is no impeachable offense because the President used military action against Iraq only after over a dozen U.N. resolutions that said disarm or face consequences. Eventually, you gotta face the consequences.
As to WMD, the President relied on a myriad of intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty, that's not a lie and that's not an impeachable offense. And not finding the WMD doesn't mean they didn't exist. If I can't find my car keys, does that mean they never existed?
So, would you like to detail all the evidences that you assured us of? |
|
7thWave
|
Clinton was impeached for lying......Bush lied to the American people about reasons for going to war............seems like an impeachable offense to me.
ps...ignore the rude comments made about your grammar. These type of people give the US a bad name. It's obvious english isn't your first language, but you're tryiing! |
|
bisquedog
|
Because the Republican congress is in Bush's back pocket Maybe after the coming election the new congress will grow a pair of balls and finally take Bush to task like they should Be doing now |
|
Rockstar
|
Because the people trying to impeach him are about as good at forming sentences as you. There's no reason to impeach him. It was all for political gain. Character assassination has been the number one tactic of politics. This is how it works:
You find one thing about a candidate/polititian, but don't release it just yet. Then you search for something far greater that may or may not be true, and release them around the same time. It seems as if we are just finding out more and more terrible stuff about our candidate and it makes all instances seem true. This is how the 9/11 conspiracy became so believable. They released his little confession to doing drugs and his DUI and the accusation about not finding WMD's all at the same time. The 9/11 consiracy came out shortly after. But none of the accusations about the conspiracy or the lack of WMD's are true. Why do you think he hasn't addressed them yet? |
|
coragryph
|
It's really amazing how many people don't think willful violation of federal laws is an impeachable offense.
Look people. The man has admitted to violating federal law. He's admitted it. He has authorized warrantless wiretaps, in violation of FISA, knowing that it was in violation of FISA. And his defense is that he doesn't think the laws should apply to him.
Nor does he think that the president should be limited by the Constitution. At last count, based solely on what he has admitted to doing, he's violated provisions of Articles I, II, IV, and VI, as well as the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments. And that's just based on what he has admitted to doing.
So, if nothing else, he is in violation of his oath to faithfully execute the laws of the land, and in violation of his oath to support and defend the Constitution.
It's amazing that people don't think this is grounds for impeachment. |
|
kimberbee
|
well when you begin to use proper grammer i will begin to answer your question. |
|
Final Frontier
|
There is no reason to impeach him. Don't you think if there was he would be gone? Get over it already. If the leaders of the Left can't find a strong enough reason to act, there isn't one. I am so sorry that you disagree with the way Bush has kept us safe the last five years, but he has done just that; kept us safe. Maybe in 2008 the Democrats, or hopefully a strong third party candidate, will emerge to take over the helm, but until then, sorry. |
|
JEFFBEV
 |
Because he hasn't committed an impeachable offense.
Your additional information doesn't make much sense. |
|
bostonianinmo
 |
Quite simple, really. The Republican party controls Congress and won't likely impeach one of their own. That could change in November. |
|
rukidding
|
OK...let me say it again because you people are apparently very slow....H e h a s d o n e n o t h i n g t h a t i s a n i m p e a c h a b l e o f f e n c e. Do you get it now? It's not that hard, really, to understand. So, why do you continue to ask this ridiculous question? |
|
gokart121
|
You have 4 years in high school and your grammar and spelling are THAT bad? Your english teacher really blew it, letting you pass...I have doubts you're even from america...and if you're not, the impeachment question doesn't concern you... |
|
Klay Doe♪
 |
You need to take a 5th year of Highschool. Unsense isn't a word we use in everday conversation. |
|
I-C-U
|
because he is the commander in chief |
|
karnovale
|
because he is handling an impossible situation very well |
|
clarity?
|
Waaaaiiiit a minute... you went to high school? They let people like you in? What did you have to do to pass? Show up? |
|
callalily07
|
because we live under a dictatorshp now!the govt can get away with anything it wants to now!
canada is starting to sound nice... |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
