everyone should have guns debate, Help?

Casy

i can't give an exact estimate no.

but i do know criminals don't like to be shot so i would imagine the decrease would be dramatic?

i also know that crime increases in areas that establish new gun grabber laws.

deathstar

an armed population is a polite population....

MsDoubtFire

If everybody was armed, and you could be killed for acting violently, less people would act violently. Arms also help stop a fascist government from seizing power. Did you know that the first thing that the Nazis did when they seized power was to ban all arms so that they could control the population by force. So if you want another band of Nazi fascist pigs to rise up and seize power then by all means ban all harms; however, if you want to make sure that no Nazi fascist pig or pigs ever again usurps power from the righteous then you should not ban arms--in fact you should make it mandatory that every arm themselves and protect their castle; because by protecting their castle with arms they are indirectly protecting everyone else's else's castle from harm by the criminal. If you ban arms the criminals will still have arms. If you do not ban arms then the criminals will be out gunned. So decide for your self if you want to be an armed freeman or an unarmed slave.

______________________________________â€¦

One of the biggest jokes of all time is gun control. Did you know in countries or states where it is easy for anybody to get a gun there is less crime then their is in countiries or states where it is difficult, if not downright impossible, to get a gun? Why is this the case? Criminals will always get guns even if guns are made illegal. Criminals will still get guns because they don't care that it is illegal to obtain a gun. Making guns illegal actually gives criminals the upper hand because they make it less likely that law abiding citizens will have the guns needed to deter criminals.

Guns are needed to deter car jackings, home invasions, and random shootings. If the criminals know that people are armed, they will be less willing to commit crimes because they know they may get shot at. If guns are illegal, criminals know this too, and are more likely to commit violent crimes without fear of retaliation.

It is kind of like countries stockpiling nuclear bombs. A country is less likely to use its nuclear weapon because it knows that other countries will use there nuclear weapon to defend against an attack. This fear deters countries from using a nuclear bomb. A gun is similar with respect to a criminal; they are less likely to use a gun if they know that other people also have guns.

So to stop the spread of violent crimes we need to make it easier for people to get guns, rather then making it harder. Guns actually used to be required so that people could protect the community. We need to remember that the right to bear arms was put into our constitution for a reason--a well armed populous is less likely to be overthrown. The first thing a dictator does is bans guns so that it is easier to take over the country. The Nazi party banned guns become taking Germany into a dark part of European history; I fear America may be heading in a similar direction. It starts with banning guns, and ends with banning personal and political freedoms. Write the congress and senate about eliminating needless gun control, before it is too late, and we end up living in a police state filled with violent criminals. Remember it takes people with guns to keep the violent criminals at bay. In short, if we had more guns in the hands of more people--we'd have less crimes occurring.

Jon J

Did it work in the Old West?

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: