"GAY Marriage"-should it be legal?

bubba bob

I want you to look at the human anatomy . God or whatever your creator is ,,did not intend for 2 men or 2 women to hook up.
If you look at 1 man and 1 woman ,the simplest of minds can see where this combination is meant to be joined.
After the examination it will be almost impossible for anyone to argue that gay marriage is acceptable in any way.
I say almost because some people out there , just can't see.

slim_jim1752

no. unnatural. and not even religious

Henry VIII

No. By definition marriage is between a man and a woman. However they should be able to have a civil union that would allow them most of the rights of married people.

elflock62

I think that people should have the freedom to do what they want as long as it's not hurting themselves or anyone else

Don

Marriage is a religous state of being in the bible. most laws are civil in nature. with civil privileges benefits and drawbacks. under civil law and the constitutions provisions of seperation of church and state it should be a no contest argument. a contract is a contract whether it be a man+woman, man+man or woman woman contract. Marriage under non sectarian or sectarian law is not religous it can only be dissolved by a court of competent jurisdiction. therefor a judge could solemnize a gay marriage because a judge can dissolve it if it becomes necessary. A marriage license fee is just a tax people pay to get married and record it with the state. be it a civil ceramony or a church cerimony.

Wyoming Rider

Two consenting adults should be able to choose their own destinies (unless it negatively affects third parties). Therefore gay marriages (which are none of anyone's business except the couple's) should be allowed.

Pets cannot consent to anything so it cannot be argued that it would be between consenting adults.

Not that I really give a twit if somebody wants to marry their pet. I mean it has no affect on me whatsoever so let em do what they want. Dumb, but I've seen dumber.

And polygamists should be able to do what they want too. How can their behaviour possibly affect anyone else (except for those that think since they don't do something, no one else should either). Although how a guy could possibly support more than one wife is beyond me.

LiveLaughLoveDanceâ™¥

yes. people should be able to choose who they want to be with for the rest of their lives.

Atheistic

The government should get out of the marriage business. Marriage should be a private matter and not left for outsiders to decide its validity. It's not their business and should not be up to debate by the general public.

chris l

marriage is supposed to be a union between 2 people that love each other. what i dont understand is why people have to have a certificate and pay a fee to do so. you want to be married, ok, then say so and you are if you feel it. others thoughts and opinions should have nothing to do with it. somewhere down the line, love was put on the back burner for money. the benefits and exemptions came into play. recognition is also a factor. it makes me wonder sometimes. its like everything else, driving down the right hand lane. you open your door into traffic. stupid. i could go on and bore you, but ill end with why is polygamy wrong? its been practiced for years in other cultures. as far as pets go, the minute they learn to say i do...............

zhack_ahn

i see no reason why to consenting adults loving eachother should be equated with between an adult and a creature not capable of giving consent.

unless you believe that guys are dogs and therefore don't see the difference.

the whole "one act i don't think is right will automatically lead to other acts that i don't think are right" train of thinking is a rather fallacious form of the slippery slope arguement.

it's a poorly construed position used to back up the enforcement of a primarily religious value on a growingly secular society.

freedom isn't meant only to fit the desired parameters of a select few.

everyone should have the right to legally demonstrate their commitment to their monogamous relationship.

Mopar Muscle Gal

Goldenrae9

Civil rights/human rights...those only apply to humans.. health care benefits... estate issues...

Beyond that it was an issue brought up to turn conservatives away from being critical towards Bush in the last election. If it were really such an issue we had a republican controlled congress and president, wouldn't we have seen stronger movement on banning it...

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: