Are you for or against attacking Iran as in Iraq?

Ben Mansour S

I must be crazy to be for attacking Iran!!!!!!

Yassine92

I am against the attack of Iran. Our lives cost more than their profits and their little schemes to establish their new world order.

North of 49

Iran has 70 million people and almost all hate the Americans. If US decided to Invade Iran, they would have to go Nuclear because that is the only way they could beat them.

Would US use NUKE? I doubt it very much.
There is no way they could win this one. The US troops are stretched too thin and could not survive an invasion into Iran.

tabbi8407

I think we America should stop attacking other nations, especially for no reason. We really had no reason to attack Iraq other than the fact the Sadam didn't want to use our Federal Reserve Notes, he wanted to use the Euro...... so we bombed him, and killed him.... YAY us Americans......Why SHOULD the world trust us America with nukes..... when we are the only country to have ever used them.... on two CIVILIAN CITIES...... America FU&% YEAH......Coming to save the mother f&*&king day!!!!!!!!

Fred K

Against its close to Russia let them worry about them and in no way do we want to repeat lessons learned in Iraq.and don't people read the news any more this country is on the Verge of bankruptcy lets just save our war money so we can bail out the millionaires

Tristan S

Against, at this point at least.

kikoman

Against !

With what army ?
We do not have enough people willing to serve to fight our present wars.

Iran is no threat to us, to Israel it is, Its time for the Israeli's to fight their own wars!

Got Shoes?

I don't think we should attack anyone as we attacked Iraq. That has been a total cluster f**k.

Karly P

Um no. If the dudes came back the bad hoe's would come back

wildestfan2000

Against since Israel will attack the Nuclear Plant if it gets to far along. That is why we are selling weapons to them.

LIBERTE

Personally, I am against all the wars, but to attack the Iran, is a simple matter, the Iran is a Moslem country, ordered by a team of Moslems that have not fears to be killed but plutot to inhale to the martyrs and of more she is endowed with artificial military means that in response to the attacks, can hurt the principal ally of the region in the occurence, Israel, also I think as the Iran will be under an economical blockade but will not be attacked jamis, In the interest of Israel in first and American interests in second, this is threats as all threats.

tophe271263

Against.
About Iran willing to get nukes, I would say: let us ALL discard nukes, Iran AND Israel, USA, France, and so on. The rest is racism, crime. In France: aristocrats wanted weapons only for aristocrats (the Revolution broke that), in English America : English leaders wanted weapons only for loyalists (Independance broke that), it is the same now : Westerners want weapons only for Westerners (terrorism try to break that). We are Evil too.

BIGTHINGS ..

I AM AGAINST UNLESS ITS NECESSARY.
THESE ARE THE COUNTRIES WE SHOULD WORRY ABOUT.
v
v
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights#Human_rights_violations

â™¥Have a Nice Day!â™¥

If it proves that they are a true threat to us & will attack at some point, we need to fight in Iran not on US soil.

SchizoWriter

I'm for kicking the **** out of Iran with the help of Israel, seeing as Russia is completely in bed with the iranian leadership we'll need the extra ally

[Deus Ex Machina]

I'm for it. >_<

Sex Gun

I am for.

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: