Home     Links     Contact Us     Bookmark  
 
   Homepage      News      Legal Forum      Dictionary  
Home : Legal Forum : Military

Could the US ever have won in Veitnam?
Find answers to your legal question.





Could the US ever have won in Veitnam?

I don’t know a great deal about it being British but it strikes me that despite all the technology and training, they never really stood a chance. The tactics of the North Vietnamese, guerrilla warfare and the impenetrability of the jungle made nearly all the technology redundant, and the North Vietnamese really believed in the cause - the US and allies were always going to be forced to withdraw due to our politics, unlike the North Vietnamese.

N.B. this is not a criticism of the US, no foreign power stood a chance. So before we get any mental nationalists claiming the USA is invincible - I do not want to cause offence.


    




wrecked_2477
Only at a huge cost in lives on both sides, just remember the Americans were the invaders to the majority of the Vietnamese who were only defending their country. The Americans lost an unwinnable war.


Robbo_op_98
Had the war been fought by Generals and not Politicians yes. Same as with Korea.


Neil T
Rating
Your points are well made. It is quite possible for the US to have won in SE Asia if the politicians had left the military to get on with it.

Matty - go read a book on the Malayan Emergency!!

RayN-here - in Korea the UN Forces were pushed a "little" further south than the 38th parallel.


jerry r
a veitnamese general wrote his autobiographby and was stated on the news that the us had the war won and the veitnamese were ready to surrender. the us only had to stick it out for a couple more days he said and they would have won. the politicians were the ones who lost the war.


DietrichVonQuint
I have heard some theories in how the war could have been won. I suppose that it is possible.


thinpinblue
I feel very sure they would have succeeded had it been left to the Military. I also recall the French got a bloody nose there prior to the U.S.A.


trixie
The war was fought by polititians.....and democrats/liberals, just as they are doing now with Iraq....claimed from day one that we can't win, we won't win and we shouldn't win, and did everything in their power to see to that. When you have a country divided that way...it's hard to win. Look back at wars like WWII, Korean War, etc. Everyone was on board with winning, and we did. That's all it takes. Instead we have USA hating liberals that try to degrade everything we are doing.


Jim B
As a former Vietnam veteran I say this. If it had been a war fought by those in the field yes we could have and would have won. The problem we had was there were to many politicians lining their own pockets who would not turn it over to the commanders in the field because it would have cut off their gravy train.Yes we still have those types in our government today,and will always. When is the last time we had politicians who really cared what happened to us the people.There is probably no one alive that remembers that.


MICHAEL B
Rating
Everyone's answers are correct. We actually won militarily but lost politically. And that's how Al Qaeda and the insurgents are trying to win now. Roadside bombs are not gonna beat the US military. Body bags and a loss of public support will. And to a degree, it's working while the politicians are looking for votes.


Matty
Rating
Impossible. Even if you win militarily (and the US army did, never losing a single major battle) , if you further allienate the population you cannot win. Colonial British was the same, the Empires soldiers were far better trained than the colonists in the revolutionary war, but the more the British fought, the more they alienated the American people, hence the war becomes un-winnable. They realised, and they left.

The only way you can win a war in which the enemy percieve they have the moral high ground and will not quit is by commiting genocide. And whats the point in that?


Ua
Militarily, we easily won every battle. But the problem is, what did we win? We could still be there, and the North Vietnamese would still be fighting us. It was an unwinnable war because there was nothing to win. We were just fighting people.


THEAmericanPatriot
We were winning when I left in 1967.


the devil wears camo
Rating
as an ex-Brit soldier i have to say yes for the same reason we could have ended northern Ireland long before that too came to an end,in both cases the military were not allowed off the leash that was held by the limp wristed politicians both in congress and Whitehall,as ever ,afraid of public opinion and in both conflicts the military in charge were sidelined by their own respective governments and not allowed to do the job they trained for,of course they could have won,pity there was no one in politics who was prepared to pay the price or find a backbone.


Croxx
Rating
Yes they could have, it would have taken a heavy US body count.

In hindsight they did nearly 'win' on several occasions depending on what perspective you take.


FlyingScooter
Rating
All we had to do was Nuke 'em. That would've been a win.

But like the first answerer said: had it been fought by generals...


Slowblinker
Rating
No.

We were hampered by the politicians, fighting against an enemy on their home turf and in a war we did not understand how to fight on its terms. Plus, while there were a lot of great soldiers, many of them should never have been over there, much less in a uniform.

I liken that war to battling mother nature. Sooner or later she is going to wear you down and win.


Ben
No, the US could never win in Vietnam. To begin with America had no logical reason to be fighting in there. Then, almost the whole of
America was against that war. The morale went down to minus zero. There was no way to win.


robert43041
The US tried to fight a "WWII" type of war while pitted against a guerilla bunch. No way could they win that one, I agree.


John R
Rating
If you check history you will find that the north Vietnam's military was ready to give up not once but twice. they didn't because of the politicians and the American people themselves. we more than likely will lose this war for the same reasons which will make the third one in a row.


older redneck
Rating
It is highly doubtful. The NVA and VC had cave systems that we never did find the complete extent of. We would advance and take some ground and they were under us waiting for us to leave. Some said put in more troops. Well if we'd had troops shoulder to shoulder across the entire country, they would have kept popping up behind us and killing our guys. Endless war.
We supposedly learned from this that a conventional military cannot defeat an insurgency, but someone obviously forgot to tell Bush about that. These dim bulbs went and did it again.....


one shot
Rating
No.

Like Northern Ireland, Afghanistan and Iraq they were fighting an unseen enemy


Marcus
Rating
You can draw a direct comparison with the Colonial British, followed by the mighty Soviet Union in Afghanistan and now us and the USA.

War is a commercial venture and a political graveyard if you're not winning.

When the cost of war is greater than the spoils of victory it's time to pull out.

Iraq on the other hand has oil.


oscarsix5
Vietnam was not lost in battle, it was lost at the negotiation table during the Paris Peace Accords. The American people gave into the Anti-war movement losing the will and dertemination to fight the war. Sadly millions of Vietnamese and other SouthEast Asian paid the price with their lives...


robert c
No!I agree with the previous contributor!I would add this as well!The soldier in the front line did not have the full backing of the general public!The final crunch came when celebrities like JaneFonda took the side of the enemy;The American soldier lost the will to fight!The American soldier did not lose the war!The General Public;Politicians and Celebreties lost it for them!I was always of the opinion it was like a heavyweight champion defending his title with his hands tied behind his back!


kingleo_99
Rating
We could have we bascially used everything execpt nukes to kill them, we would have never been able to use nukes cause of the high tension with China, that what it comes down to really <China>!! Like we been in this dance with Russia and China now for last 30+ years!


Ed J
Possible, but not probable. With very few exceptions the majority of the population were not behind the war, it was political, when the people support one side over the other, the side with the greater support of the population usually wins. The vast number of the population just wanted to tend their crops and live a day to day life.


desertviking_00
Yes. If we had executed Operation Tiger Claw, North Vietnam would have been cut in half and all lines of communication to South Vietnam would have been cut as well. Unfortunately, the President of the United States would not sign the order to execute the operation. He turned it down seven times.


bijjee
Rating
no





 Enter Your Message or Comment


User Name:  
User Email:   
Post a comment:




Legal Discussion Forum

 What are soldiers still doing in Iraq Should they not be out by now? Isn't it long overdue for them to home?
...


 Can you suggest some relatively UNbiased sources for information on the Iraq war?
...


 How long would it take for China to conquer Britain?
bearing in mind our Army is over 19 times the size as ...


 How can you not support Israel against an International Terrorist Organisation?
I am in support of the Israeli's finishing what they have started and to completely remove Hezbollah from the planet, once and for all. Whilst there are some people who will not agree with me, I ...


 Why are soldiers fighting for us???
...


 What U.S. president ordered a secret taping system installed aboard Air Force One?
...


 Why did Britain even want the Falkland Islands.?
Why did Britain feel it was worth it to go to war over the Falkland Island, I saw a question about the Falkland war on here and made wonder what the signifigents of the Falkland Islands was.
A...


 Who think's a women can be in the army special forces?
the army i don't under stand why women can't be in the special forces we are just is good is men for are we not??.............because my dereem sits i was a littel girl to be in the special ...


 If the uk and the US broke its alliance and raged a war against each other who do you think will wim?
in my oppinon it will be the US hands ...


 The US is being run by War Criminals - what do you do??
The US led invasion of Iraq was Illegal under International Law.
The US were indeed the first nation to sign the UN Charter in 1945 so they are bound by both domestic and international Law so ...


 If you could tell one American soldier?
If you could tell one American soldier one thing the night before he went overseas to fight for his country, what would you tell him? Something that he would remember for the rest of his life...
<...


 Where were you on Sept. 11, 2001 when you first heard of the tragic news??
...


 The war on terror should be won by hugs not bombs?
You never know it might work and it would be cheeper
Additional Details
still if we just keep hugging they will eventualy run out of bombs and bullets and there beheading arm will get ...


 Do they really treat you poorly in the military?
I'm considering joining...some people say they treat you very poorly. Is this true? How do you know. Thanks....


 If captured by the enemy would you crack if tortured ?
...


 What is the point of the British Army?
Why do we need them in contemporary Britain?...


 Why USA has just realized it is no longer the most powerful country
Russia could easily beat USA since it is increasing in strength since the collapse of the soviet union and Russia has proved it showing its might on Georgia i am afraid to tell you Americans but it�...


 Isn't it time to bring back the draft?
Our youth is out of control. It used to be that either you went to college or you went in the military. Now it's either college or the gangs. Get them off the streets! Every person aged 16 ...


 If iran launched a nuke at america, would the rest of the world care? really?

Additional Details
but they're only americans. they don't count really. think how much lighter the world will ...


 If Vietnam Invaded The UK?
how long would your army hold out. a few days? we becoming more powerful (look at our GDP) my father in vietcong noone can destroy us not even america
Additional Details
you believe that ...




Copyright (c) 2009-2011 Wiki Law 3k Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - Trusted legal information for you.
Archive: Forum  |  Forum  |  Forum  |  Links
0.084