 
|
alan r.
 |
Diplomacy first is always the best way.The Iranians know full well how the British govt can act. |
|
mervyn m
 |
No.What's weak about handling a situation like this thru diplomacy.They are just rattling the sword now that Iraq is'nt the dominant power in the middle east anymore.
Besides, I would'nt be supprised if the SAS & SBS were already in place.I'm sure that HMG & the MoD have had contingency plans in place for a while now just in case what has happened happened before. |
|
spareo1
 |
Don't confuse weakness with hope. It's better to hold off and try diplomacy then to 'rush in and regret it'. |
|
pablo techno escabar 1
|
Yes if having a brain and wanting diplomacy instead of war
makes you weak. |
|
N. Cognito
 |
Some will.
Some won't.
So what?
Diplomacy should not be confused with weakness. |
|
retired military wife
 |
I assume "us" means the British. As an American, I'll respond.
The answer is no, we're not laughing at you. Remember, we had a similar situation with Iran. They stormed the US Embassy and took our people as hostages in November 1979. This was while a Democratic President (Carter) was in office. They weren't released until January 1981, within an hour after a Republican President (Reagan) was swown in.
Your situation just happened. Of course you should try diplomacy first. But there has to be a time limit for that. If the Iranians know you're willing to negotiate forever, where's their incentive to cooperate? |
|
Boomrat
 |
I'm not laughing at you. I wish you all the best and will support any decision your government makes. You have stood behind us and now its our turn to watch you in action. Good Luck and if this becomes a tag team match, I hope and pray that our Libby Congress don't back down. |
|
frankturk50
 |
Only the half wits the ones with an inkling of common sense will not consider it weak but sensible.Would you consider it strong to kill thousands of people to make us look strong to the Americans or anyone else. |
|
Jewel
 |
I agree with the first answer.
To be honest I have better ways to fill my mind.
Man begot trouble begot bad news begot idiots begot mindlessness begot man..................... |
|
Mucky
|
Personally I'm glad we are not Amercian and start firing rockets and bullets into the air. The British's best asset is our diplomacy. When that fails then we'll send our people (not the yanks) to go and 'politely' ask for them back. |
|
David
|
We are nothing like the Yanks. We are not weak, We don't brag but we are sly and devious.
I would bet the SAS are already there.
Blair is playing the waiting game.Not good for the soldiers but may well save their lives |
|
Noodle
|
Correction Illegally detained soldiers, Who cares!!! Get In Get Them Out and sorry for anyone in the way that's my view, Just bring them home safely. |
|
The Weird One!
|
Time we got in there and got them back, no good sitting around a table talking about it, these people will be scarred for life as it is, sooner they are home the better! |
|
bellyman
|
if some are laughing at us then it gos to show how stupid some are... people have to remember we do not have a large army etc like the USA so we cant just go trying to bully people like the USA can..
plus to the ones who are laughing at us then , don't forget who's the main one backing you up in IRAQ and who will you turn to to help you with IRAN if you do attack....
i am sure you think you could of attacked IRAQ without us.. so why did you ask us... |
|
oldsalt6585
|
Personally, as an American, I feel the British gov't is in a difficult position. The U.S. was in the same position several years ago with the N. Koreans. The Iranian gov't could move the prisoners anyplace in the country. Any hostile act by GB could very well sign the death warrants of the Sailors/Marines. Even the THREAT of retaliation against Iran could cause the death of the British troops.
All we can do on this end is pray things play out for the good of the British troops in captivity.
(USN, retired) |
|
Andrew
|
well there are always ignorant people that will laugh anywhere - the strongarm politics of imperialism are of the past - a proper chance has to be given with plenty of time. The US faced a problem with Iranians in the Carter administration in the 1970's and the US hostages where in Iran over a year - when Regan got in then they were released. It wont be that long of course because GW Bush is in power and Blair seems to be taking a more aggressive posture. |
|
?
|
Who cares? They are hardly in a position to laugh at anyone. Look at the mess in Iraq for starters. |
|
nosdda
|
How can you say that when the Americans had hundreds of soldiers detained in Vietnam that they had to negotiate for? |
|
...
|
we are not in a place to laugh, we handle everything wrong |
|
mudmarine
|
No,you're doing it right.
Get international opinion behind you,then IF the sailors are harmed,youcan blow those camel fleas to hell. |
|
srracvuee
|
what did you expect from our lady foreign secretary !!and yes they have as much as said so they would have dealt with it differently but I'm not concerned of their opinion I'm only concerned with our own |
|
johnis101
|
who cares what they think if we left it to them the soldiers would most likely be killed if not hit by friendly fire |
|
absolved lemon
|
you mean sailors! and marines. they are not soldiers. nobody is laughing at anyone. if people think its a conspiracy with Iraqi "insurgents" buzz! wrong Iraq and Iran hate each other. send in the British special forces, even the sas and and sbs would laugh at that. the marine and navy personnel were caught bang to rights and taken into custody under the Geneva convention. funny how Britain is claiming UN sanctioned water to the sqare inch when 30 miles separates Britain from Ireland, several hundred miles from Britain to Gibraltar and 9 thousand from Britain to the Malvina's islands. remember when British marines landed on Spain by accident! personnel were sent to chase them. the British marines acted like it was a big joke. so who's laughing now. |
|
johnboy
|
we should tell them to release our soldiers or else we will send in the sas to get them out.that will put the shitters right up them. |
|
Redhead
|
A little diplomacy - or whats the US version - go in guns blasting - another War - just what Bush wants. |
|
UncleRico
|
Until the french get tired of them being held captive, and decide to rescue them themselves, there's no need to be embarassed. |
|
clueless_nerd
|
If by "US" you mean Iran, we are not "laughing at you" for anything, least of all your record on Human Rights and your treatment of Women. |
|
Voice of Liberty
|
I actually feel bad for you. Study the Roman Empire. You will see that the British Empire (haha) mirrors that. Are the Romans around today? They became lazy and soft and put too much faith in their government which was incapable of sustaining the empire's people and resources. Soldiers were slaughtered, women were raped, and their children were enslaved by their enemies which they were too lazy to face. Sorry chap. |
|
Butterbar Bob
|
Not laughing.
Weeping, actually, at Britain no longer being the country of Henry IV, Lord Admiral Nelson, the Duke of Wellington, or Churchill.
THAT England would never have tolerated such affront from a pissant country like Iran.
"Diplomacy" my derriere, it is weakness in the face of an act of war. |
|
?
|
and how do you know what way the iranians are treating the imprisoned soldiers? |
|
thomas b
|
yes we do |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
