|

regerugged
|
Yes, I do. All tyrants start out small and keep getting worse, until someone finally smacks them down. Hitler and Hussein are some recent examples. |
|

Jin K
|
I think it would be foolish to go after Iran with military tactics. It's a big waste of money and would further destabilize the Middle East. We've wasted enough time in the Middle East, it's about time we get out. |
|

shilo9i
|
Any price? Ah, no.
By the way, could you please explain what we would be stopping them from doing? |
|

caldude1010101
|
I don't.
Iran isn't anymore of a threat to the soverneighty of the USA, than Iraq under Saddam was.
If Israel has a problem, they have the military capability to solve it. The US should stay out of it. |
|

halfshaft
 |
Stopped from what? |
|

Capellan
|
No...
we must always weigh peaceful options if at all possible. Any price is a heavy price and we are still recovering from a lengthy conflict overseas.
Military strategy is supposed to align with the National Security Strategy, which spells out how and when we might "take action on" other nations. |
|

Mr Q
 |
No, I think the Bush administration and their "war on terror" should be stopped. What gives us the right to bomb a country that has not attacked us? Fear that they might attack us? A preemptive strike should only be carried out based on a legit, undeniable, immediate pending attack. Not based on fear of what they MIGHT do down the road. Or what weapons they MIGHT have someday. Bombing a country back to the stone age is not the way to respond to every country that doesn't like our policies and administration. |
|

Fred K
|
Here if there that big of a Threat I'm sure Russia or china will deal with them they should fear them more than us |
|

Lu B
 |
Stopped from what?
Any price-- no. Some price maybe. The word out there at least last time I checked that US doctrine called for no rehabilitation of Iran after a strike or as a Colonel I know put it "we'll turn it into glass."
I truly believe that neither the White House nor the military want to get into it with Iran. But if Israel strikes we may be forced to. Scary thought. |
|

Bill R
|
i don't want war, not at all, but it would be a lot worse if we let iran get nukes so yes at any horrible price
pray it wont come to that |
|

John S
 |
I think the whole middle eastern region should be nuked including Saudi Arabia and Israel. |
|

Scandguard
|
I do. |
|

Tinman12
|
No. We might have to sit this one out if Iran goes to war with anybody. If Iran decides to attack Israel, then don't bother to go to work. The price of fuel will hit the ceiling,but that will be short lived. Once the smoke clears and all of Iran is smotherd in glass, then all the threats will be over. Iraq will then move in to whats left of Iran and finish the war that Saddam Hussien started with Iran back in the 80's. The war for the oil fields. We'll have more oil than we can consume. Iraq will need to rebuild itself into the 21st century. It will use that oil money to refurbish.
This time, it won't be our fight. Thank God. |
|

beau l
 |
Iran will not be allowed to obtain nuclear missiles unless Obama becomes the President of America. Bush and McCain would unleash hell on their country and level entire sand mountains before the can even acquire 1 nuke. |
|

|
|
|