In battle, would you rather use current weapons or old style weapons.?

dakota_gal_1968

Old weapons. the only people killed would be the people in battle. If you use nukes that is killing alot of innocent people that may not even believe in the war or what they are fighting about.

Bottom Contributor

well if they can choose a tank. I'm sure as hell not going to choose a mace.

Girly Q

Guns, they're quick and easy, 357 semi automatic

Cameron L

If you're saying that everyone had it, I would probably go with "Old" style weapons, because they make for much better action sequences in movies, which I suspect you watch too many of. There is a great argument for modern weapons, however: Explosions.

Henry VIII

If both sides are evenly matched it won't matter. The one difference, however, is that swords don't level entire countries as nukes do. There is no fall out from conventional bombs or from a trebouchet as there is with nukes. Arrows rarely cause mass dist ruction as nukes do.

gary b

you take the bows and arrows and I will take a 155 howitzer

thered4

current weapons

Veon

Cristina O... Are you retarded? With modern weapons, we can take out a building, without moving the dust on the one right next to it. That`s what`s good about modern weapons. Now with capatults, you`re not gonna take out a tank or anything for that matter. I`ll smile while the hippy ******* get slaughtered by our guns.

williebaznj

are you retarded or something? You monster stupid mentally challenged weird odd insulting weirdo retard any of the old weapons cant stop a plane or a tank so back off foe!

Dirty D

I believe the age old saying "If you're going to a gun fight you'd best bring a gun" applies here. If my enemy has an AK-47 I damn sure wouldn't try to take him on with a sword.

avail_skillz

old style weapons, because it makes the battle a little more personal, and people might think twice about going to war.

SoupRAhYPE

well
new
these days YOU really dont have to go to war due the technology stuff

Michael W

i don't really think a bow and arrow can do a tank much justice do you?

tom l

I'll go for a M-249 SAW anyday!!

Kevin

I would rather use current weapons cause u have more of a chance not dieing in battle.

Sabrina

I think I would rather just watch a movie.

bigbrother

what would I rather use? the weapon that I didn't get hurt with and the one where there were no civilian casualties. As weapons have developed the attacker has always try to distance himself from the actual conflict...ie it started with clubbing each other..then the sword (arms length away) catapult (much further away) and to the extreme nuclear missiles. I think that I would rather use a sword as it would be with honour and you could see who you kill and it would affect you if you were the victor. HOWEVER like the rest of the human race I would prefer not to face up to the horror of actually killing someone and foreshortening their life so would probably go a fly a stealth plane with laser guided missles. How about you? Chicken?

Joe L

I would like to use mind control weapons like in the movie Scanners or Firestarter to make peoples' heads explode, that's pretty neat.

itsmeok2001

I would just lie in a bunker and let everyone kill each other. Of course I would have lots of modern weapons down there with me.

Cristina

old weapons. those were the days of tactical warfare, one on one combat, and honor.
nowadays you can just bomb a city, killing mostly civilians.

veon: read the damn question, or are you too illiterate? I'm not choosing old-style weapons to fight new ones.

James

nukes. blow everybodys *** up.

lamplighter

STICKS and BALLOONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No-one gets hurt that way.
HEY MAN MAKE PEACE NOT WAR!!!,That still carry`s today never mind in our "HIPPY" days.
TRUE BRIT

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: