Is War good or bad???

sasquatch jr.

to me any war is wrong. any killing is wrong. how come we call it murder when one person kills another- or if 2,5,10, 100, 1000 ,etc. kill others. how many people have to be involved for it to be called noble?

mrmaltvinegar

It depends, war as bad as it sounds seems to propel society after it is fought. It can bring amazing things out some people, sometimes brings out the best and sometimes it brings out the worst. The Norse version of heaven was an everlasting war that one could wage in. While other people think that the after life is eternal peace. It's just different for some people, it's all about perception.

nero_does_napoli

Bad....real bad.

arbiter

good for those who only those know how to fight, but to pascifists it's horrible

Dee Dee

Depends on how you see it.

Bad: We waste trillions of dollars and lives to prove ONE point.

Good: Gets the economy going. War = Jobs = Money = More products.

Answerman

War is not very good for living things, and the environment but is good for repuglicans to fatten their wallets.

mouse001

Fault isn't spelled "falt" dumb-***!!! >:o GRUMBLE-GRUMBLE-GRUMBLE!

...lol, this is a joke based on your last question. (Just in case you see this first and are confuzzled)

But war actually is supposed to be good...I just can't remember the reasons. But there ARE real reasons...like, the economy and junk.

the_gooey_1

Are you actually asking that stupid of a question?

Owlwings

War is never a good thing. Sometimes it's thought of as the lesser of two evils.

TakingStock

War is not good or bad; it's either necessary or not. It's a must in many situations in which either diplomacy fails or you are dealing with a rogue nation.

As John Stuart Mill once said, "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

scafool

Depends if you win or lose

HHH

I think the next war which i think will be ww3 will be the end of mankind because almost everybody these days has nukes.Can you imagine your country being nuked and no one being able to live there because of the radiation.

YourDreamDoc

Good for general public and if you win, bad if you lose and if youare victiims

territheterribleliar

financially its good for the business man , bad for the people who die, good for population control, bad for morale, good for the winning party bad for the natural resources, good for politics ,bad for...

Atheist

Some get killed, some get rich. I have read somewhere that in modern war about 90-95% of killed people are civilians. For killed Iraqis the war has not turned out good.

ranmdomdude

just look at it this way. if theres only 1 country invading anoter country , and no country fights back it cant be called a war, but if there is a country who will stand up and fight, now theres two countries fighting each other now that is a war.

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: