|

Nothing to say?
 |
Churchill was a fachist. He used poison to gass the kurds and deliberately tried to destror entire cities and evertone in it with fir bombs (eg Dresden).
For those people that blame islam, most know very little about it except the myths and propoganda. It would help of people found out about islam from muslims.
WW3 has already started. There are plenty of examples of meglomaniacs and powerful nations in history who wanted to rule the world. The US is having a go now but it will go the way of all previous attempts. eg. the sun was never supposed to set on the British empire - now "phoney Bliar" has to be content with being pet poodle no 2 (behind Angela Merkl).
The Real test for the US will come when it is relegated to third rate power behind China and India. |
|

scarlettt_ohara
|
No Islam is the culprit. In 1899 Winston Churchill predicted that they would be trouble
Winston Churchill On Islam
A quote from an 1899 book by Winston Churchill, "The River War", in which he describes Muslims he apparently observed during Kitchener's campaign in the Sudan
--------------------------------------...
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome. |
|

hammy
|
because only the US has the balls to |
|

spicoli
 |
Nobody is strong enough right now to take us on in a major war. We also have more sway in international affairs because of our military and economic strength |
|

Final Frontier
|
When were the other 108 World Wars? |
|

Roadrunner58-79
|
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WWIII has already started as of 11 September 2001 and was "sparked" by Osama bin Laden, who has already admitted it, and his alQaida Islamo-Fascist terrorist network.
America does NOT tell the world how to behave, that is up to the United Nations to do that, along with the UN Security Council!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... |
|

j H
|
Not much on Roman Numerals, heh? |
|

Bottles
 |
First let's work together and define 'spark'. Would you define 'spark' as N. Korea threatening nuclear war? Would you define 'spark' as terrorist (al queda) attacks, terrorist harboring, terrorist funding, terrorist guidance, or perhaps you don't consider those examples to be a 'spark'. Please clarify. Then, the reason The United States of America is always in the forefront of policing world behavior is because the United States of America is the big guy on the block. And if you are small and not able to defend yourself on your own, then you would go ask the 'big guy on the block' to help. France is never firm, consistent, or in any position to achieve anything on their own. Australia is a good friend, but not quite big enough to handle the situation at hand. And quite frankly, you must be joking about Brazil or Sweden. Please elaborate to receive the answer you're looking for.
EDIT* GEE Mikey, all these great and thoughtful responses and not a 'peep' out of you!!! Things that make you go HMMMMMM!!!! |
|

michael m
 |
no, to many responsible people will intervene, when it comes it will come through Israel and the middle east |
|

sacolunga
 |
What about World War 3-110? Well, because the France are ungrateful sissies, and the rest of the world counts on the U.S. to erradicate evil. |
|

mmd
|
Scarlett,
You're a wonder, you are.
Thanks. |
|

david r
|
I think we need to have ww 3 - 110 before we get to 111. |
|

rainman
 |
WW3 is already underway -- except it goes by a different name - terrorism. It is a war where the enemy in unknown, its' consequences can affect anybody, anywhere and at any time and are no winners. |
|

cha
 |
well he is know as a war munger |
|

C = JD
|
111? I thought we only 2 world wars. The next one would be WWIII. |
|

billybus
 |
a "World war " of maybe a third kind, is inevitable,whomever is mad enough,and powerfull enough to start it.It is not a matter of whom,where and and if, but when?????????????? |
|

jeremi15301
|
bush has big balls little brain |
|

Wolfpacker
 |
Because when the world gets in trouble, they call us.
History has repeated itself, if others do not play well
together then we must fight & die to defend them - read up on WWII. If Clinton & followers did not spark WWIII, then Bush & followers will not either. |
|

johnstrangey
|
they all-ready have in years to come people with call the wars we are in now ww3 |
|

chaz
|
He already has the day after 09/11......clock is ticking |
|

Veritas
 |
It takes two to tango. Why is it Bush that is likely to spark ww3. |
|

wolfman72585
|
France would surrender before they could tell another country how to behave. Australia is one of the US allies and supports our efforts, like Americans not all Australians do but their government does. Sweden has missiles pointed at everyone and really doesn't want anything to do with any conflict. Brazil just doesn't have the means to do anything like that and back it up. This is why America does the dirty work. |
|

Paul J.C.
 |
I was of the opinion that he had already done it in his crusade to create a New World Order. Did I miss the cease-fire decleration? Thought not. |
|

LMH
|
Deep question, i have asked myself that. |
|

henke
 |
109 world wars in 2 years, i doubt it |
|

iain
 |
Bush is finished and it is nonsense to start a WW III since
it would not kill all of us but would certainly put the environment
in a state of complete calamity right away, instead of 2.025
as estimated by the scientists, which gives us enough time
to do something about it if Bush or successor signs the
Kioto agreement, which I think they will, and soon as Bush is
out. The USA, as they stand now, produce 25% of all the
world‘s pollution, but Arnie (Schwaznegger) has passed a bill
in California which is the USA‘s most populated state, and other
States are following the example to the point that now, the
Republicans are in favour of Kioto agreement and Bush can
do nothing about it since the democrats are also in favour.
Sorry for getting into another subject, but it will be the
pollution that will kill us more than the guns. I wish you well,
Iain Ritchie. |
|

?
|
I reckon so. But dont you think its a joke the yankee doodle dandy tells other countries to get rid of nukes, then makes a load more 4 himself. we will b next on his death list |
|

ciaragw
|
probable more than possible |
|

taxed till i die,
 |
Anything is possible |
|

eternallyactive
 |
Possible? He has been trying and doing!
check the link
http://www.infowars.tv/infowars.html
and look for 911truth.org too |
|

|
|
|