 
|
Timothy M
|
As a Republican voter, I must say.... yes he should, he is responsible and here in America we should hold our leaders accountable. |
|
skw60
|
President Bush is doing what he thinks is best... Pray for the man
Pray for our service people and quit knocking the US president.
I would not want his job, can you do better? |
|
greencreeper
|
You ought to feel lucky that being a dumbass isn't a crime or you'd be on trial. |
|
bigmikejones
 |
If we were not over there keeping them busy, they would be here, daily, blowing up and killing people and you same ones would want him on trial for not doing his job. You cant have it both ways!!!
While I don't think Bush has done all he can do, I know this, we cant hide our heads in the sand and hope Terrorism goes away. For many nations, from Israel to Spain, from Bosnia to Indonesia, they live with it daily. All you have to do is open a news paper or watch the news on TV and you too will see what is going on in the world.
So far, since the start of Iraq, we haven't had any bombings in LA, or Washington, or New York or Houston. We have not had any major attacks on our soil.
So my question to you is, " if you had been the President on 911, WHAT would you have done?" Don't say negotiate cause the UN with all its resolutions and all the talk since 90, still hadn't solved the problem.
You need a serious reality check on life cause its not fair, its not FREE and sometimes the cost for the Freedoms we have and abuse, is not Free.
Semper Fi |
|
Rich B
|
For about the 20th time today, no.
And there were WMD pal, we sold them to the guy. Thanks to the UN for stalling long enough to make billions off the oil for food scam and thanks to the revisionists who wish to deny they were there. What do you suppose he killed the Kurds with...harsh language?
And Congress and the Senate had all the same intel he had. Why no love for them? Doesn't fit your plan of hatred and blind bashing?
After Tehran is in the hands of it's citizens and not under the control of radical Islamic cowards, then we can decide if it was worth it. See, we haven't finished yet. |
|
Luekas
 |
I appreciate what our troops do but Bush did not force them into anything. They knew what they were getting themselves into when they enlisted. So stop and think next time instead of pinning everything on Bush. Believe it or not but he doesn't cause all the problems in this country. |
|
Balsabulb Y
 |
No. But, if a trial were held for stupidity, you would be a number one candidate. |
|
Kyle
 |
All of us soldiers joined the military knowing the risk. Not saying I agree but soldiers follow orders too a T thats why we are a successful nation. Bush is doing what he has to do to protect this nation and other nations. |
|
wellarmedlamb
|
No. You are just dead wrong. |
|
Curt
|
First of all, the war was not started on lies of WMDs. Just because none were found does not mean they lied. They were just wrong.
As far as your original question, what kind of war did you expect? Did you expect us to invade a country without anyone dying? In a perfect world we could avoid this sort of thing, but this world is far from perfect so we will continue to fight, and people will die for their cause. |
|
shrty0525
|
You're wrong. Way less Iraqis killed (innocent ones anyway) by the US than by Saddam.
Why don't you research BEFORE posting a question that is wrong on all aspects? |
|
sara l
|
i don't know why people here are so offensive about ur question, though it is av good reasonable question. u r the most intelligent among them as u don't take things for face value as they do. from a humane point of view, YES he deserves to be on trial for causing the death of unbelievable number of innocent human beings for no real reason. sorry to say the american soliders wasted their life for no real cause!! from an elusive point of view,no because of his war against terrorism, though terrorism characterizes his massacres in Iraq, and Afganstan or did u forget that u fight every enemy but ur enemy, where is osama bin laden now ?! can anyone answer this question. i doubt Actually he puts the seed of terrorism by enlarging the number of his enemies!!! |
|
ANIMAL
|
Guess what? The dead American soldiers you speak of volunteered for their service. They were not innocent as you proclaim... they were soldiers willing to fight and die for our country... it comes with the job.
You wouldn't know what a patriot is even if they punched you in the face. |
|
russellmania8523
|
To put someone on trial, you must have direct evidence to have him found guilty. I don't think that the evidence would be strong enough to put Bush away. Its not what you know, its what you can prove. |
|
Marc h
 |
No. Because think about this. It is not a crime to be strategically stupid and insanely stubborn, war or otherwise. Being stupid is not a crime, but it should be in a national leader. |
|
Raven
 |
Yes he and his henchmen should be on trial but then republicans only go after lies about bjs. |
|
*****
 |
Americans for the most part are so apathetic, they only care about what happens to them. |
|
Dognose0
|
Exactly! Now let's see how many blind Republosheep tell you to "go to Iraq" even though it's they who support the "war" but are unwilling to go fight it. |
|
cristina s
|
yes |
|
?
|
for the dead americans yes |
|
r1b1c*
|
Why only American soldiers? many European soldiers died there as well.
And no. As United Statesian commander in chief he can do as he wishes, he was wrong but he committed no criminal acts. You see the victors set the rules. |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
