 
|
janice
|
Yes. It's a shame that Israel didn't have their military ducks in a row before going after Hezbollah. If they had gotten rid of them, maybe they would have taken on Iran and done the rest of the world a HUGE favor. |
|
AbdulShaza
|
America has nuclear weapons. That makes me more nervous than the possibility that Iran might one day have some...
Who knows that they won't use one -or ten- when its convenient? After all, america has used nukes on civilian populations before... Iran hasn't. |
|
UnaBlogger
 |
Yeah., then we could sell them one of ours. |
|
Daniel
|
yes |
|
beer_farts
 |
yes |
|
Curt
 |
Yes. Or we can wait around till they blow up Israel. |
|
jimmy two times
 |
Yes, but you are opening a huge can of high explosive worms. Do we need more suicide bombers in the UK. The Muslim communitee will get more upset and say we are picking on them.
Do we really need more conflict in the world. If we do I don't want the British to be anything to do with it. We have followed Uncle George Bush to far and I don't want to keep up with him anymore. Perhaps Russia, China, france will help out and get their hands dirty on this one. |
|
Ren Hoek
 |
Through sabotage/covert action. Nobody needs another war or nuke. |
|
Somniferous
|
Why not ask THE US ITSELF to destroy its own???????? |
|
united9198
 |
That might be a huge challenge. We are in a weak position on Iran due to the difficulty in keeping the peace in Iraq. We should keep the pressure on until it hurts and hope for a solution that does not call for military action. Of course if that does not work, we have the ability to take it out. |
|
worriedaboutyou
|
I disagree: We need to disarm that lunatic trigger-happy Olmert as a first step toward making the region a nuclear free zone. And then iran will have no reason to create wmd's. |
|
briang731/ bvincent
|
I certainly believe that it should be destroyed. Then we can watch to see what moves Russia and China plan on making over this.. You see, those are the real villians in this whole scenario, yet I see no advantage to waiting for someone to blink. |
|
candi k
|
duh |
|
wrepete1951
|
If it isn't, you can bet they'll use it on us or the Israelis or both at their first opportunity. You have to remember that these people are barbarians and want to take over the world. In order to that, they know that they must get the West out of the way. Don't say I didn't warn you ahead of time. |
|
here17now36
|
According to Democrats... NO! We should wait, since they havent done anything yet, we shouldnt be mean to them. But when they do build a nuke and drop it on NYC, they can always blame Bush. |
|
eighth_square
 |
Give Answer Man the 10 points he has the ANSWER! |
|
bullwinklejmoose
|
Yes! North Korea should have been dealt with the same way! But you would have needed a President that was concentrating on the future, not HIS future! |
|
ELIZABETH
|
Yes, it should be destroyed. The last thing any one needs is more bombs or weapons. If every one took the time to work together instead of killing each other and destroying the land this would be a wonderful world. |
|
TutSki YanCheg
|
stopped yes
destroyed no |
|
a tao
|
If anyone has the right to do that, then Iran surely has the right to nuke them.
If you go along with the the idea that its ok to interfere with Iran on this matter, then it is also ok to castrate boys since they are developing the means for rape. |
|
Pez
|
Perhaps. |
|
fatsausage
|
YES - but who has the guts to do it?
There is not one Country in the World that even has the guts to disarm Hezbullah - a child of Iran. There is not one country in the World that will face up to Syria - an ally of Iran. |
|
Engonos
|
NO. |
|
mr. political
|
they are the biggest threat to the world and we cant destroy em' cause we have to go through the U.N. beauracracy and the Geneva conventions laws |
|
kerilyn (RIP Nolte)
|
GEE...I WONDER.....ARE YOU FOR REAL? |
|
|
|
|
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
