|

brian L
 |
Both sides lose as both have a nuke force big enough to destroy each other. The missile defense system can only stop a few missiles if it really works at all. the Chinese are also building sub launched ballistic missiles for there new class of Boomer. This will allow them to launch from a direction that wouldn't be harassed by the missile defense system at all. So in the Final analysis it is suicide to attack China. |
|

?
|
Right now? USA easy. Another 4-8 yrs of the Dems in office would make it a close war... If it got really nasty I'm sure our Allies would join in and seal the victory. No one really likes China... As a matter of fact alot of people would like to see the Chinese Commies ROT IN HELL! The ROC is good but the PRC is bad... FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS! |
|

Crackoa
 |
China. It would hardly even be a fair fight with the Kung Fu and all. One of their trained ninjas can take out like 10 of our guys without any of them even realizing he is there. They have all kinds of crazy smoke bombs, flash paper, and throwing stars that confuse their opponents. A lot of the U.S. guys would be dead before the even realized that anything had happened. |
|

Robert P
 |
USA... more ICBMs |
|

AWA
|
No one can win each other, both will be loosers |
|

knot_your_daddy
|
That depends - Nuclear or Conventional ?
Nuclear = USA Victory(We have far more nukes)
Conventional = China Victory(They have FAR more soldiers) |
|

superjoezzz@sbcglobal.net
 |
It would be a nuclear war. First strike wins. |
|

Centurion529
|
That's a tough one, I would have to say the US due to more advanced technology and a more stable infrastructure. But I don't see the US and China going at it anytime soon, we have way too many common interests in trade and finance to risk it. You would be hard pressed to find something that doesn't say "made in china" and they would be financially devastated without American markets and investors. |
|

Nunoyvgvna Awi
|
why not have NO WAR and everyone wins.....makes more logical sense.
you would think by now....the human race would of evolved enough to realize that fighting and wars only cause more fighting and more wars. |
|

SVS Blog
 |
Ok people were's the pride. If Chine invaded us we would win hands down. I would fight for my country any day and I hope to think you all would too. If for some stupid reason (like if democrates took over) we invaded them we would lose. It's all most impossible to win a war when we are on someone else's own turf. We all ready won the war in Iraq we just have to finish it. Suddam is gone and we occupy their country. It will only take a matter of time before we finish. |
|

Jack Chedeville
|
China because the communists do not value individual human life, and they have a standing army of at least one million. |
|

rob
 |
USA USA USA man we got every weaons outhere Like an Area 51 we made a nonstop bullet guns |
|

thylawyer
|
China - in the long run, because China is so big and has so many people, and they own so much of the USA already, not to mention what would happen if China wanted the US to pay all the money back that it borrowed and is borrowing (off budget, course) to pay for the Iraq war.
The US might be able to win short-term because it has nukes, but the damage to the Earth by such a move would eventually cause the US harm, too. |
|

navy_hobo
|
USA- because of arrogance and ability to drive. |
|

Hey Guess What?!
 |
USA I think you all underestimate the power and skill of the US Military. They may have more man power but the skill of our military outpowers them. |
|

rigby88
|
wow this is a great question. I really think that China would win. they do have 3 billion ppl. and they're building up their Navy so i hear. Also if you havnt seen in the news in the last few days they now have missils capable of shooting down low orbiting satellites...those are our eyes and ears |
|

f f
|
With Nukes unpredictable-without nukes China could takeover Usa. Heck, if Nazi Germany had fought Usa alone Germany would have won. The Germans dominated the Americans in battles in ww2. |
|

Lord Of Lust
 |
Nuclear warfare...there is no winner in it.
As for the conventional warfare, u.s.a should win if one on one.
But that will be the end of war mungering of that mighty nation for nothing will be left of it as well. |
|

Common Sense
 |
In unrestricted nuclear warfare, the U.S. would crush China in the blink of an eye. |
|

John Z
|
China would win. Although US has more technology, and China has more people. Due to the constant fighting in this century already. Another campaign in China would defeat the US internally. No one would support another war and the US would be forced to retreat. It would take a much more popular (not better) president to convince America that a war in China was necessary. Another factor in a war with China is nuclear power. It could be over really quick if some one made a preemptive launch of nuclear warheads. |
|

K_BIZ
|
China, because either it would have to go nuclear which would cause Russia to declare war on us and we would be destroyed, or the threat of Russia would PREVENT us from going nuclear which means a conventional war, and China vastly outnumbers the USA. |
|

An Agent of Chaos
 |
Depends where the war is being fought. If it was fought in China, I would say China. If its fought in the USA, I'd say the Americans. If we can't beat a bunch of rebels in their own country...we sure can't beat the developing China. |
|

Irmak
|
USA..Technology. |
|

volcanicactive000111
 |
No clear winner.Much cost pain and hardship for decades if not a century.A friend is much better than enemy. |
|

Ali
 |
US is barely fighting Afghanistan and Iraq |
|

me
 |
China because the US turned into a bunch of wimps who will only fight Politically Correct wars. We can't even win a war with a piss a** country like Iraq. |
|

wnp46
 |
china more power |
|

Rja
|
Aside from a full scale Nuclear war right now, there is no way the US could win. Come on. We can't even win in Iraq or Vietnam. |
|

scott b
|
China based on sheer man power |
|

|
|
|