|

Dennis F
|
First, it will never happen. To those that think it could not be worse than it is now.
You all have short term memories or to young to remember. Go back to late 70s under the Carter administration.
We had just gotten out of an unpopular war in Viet Nam. The economy was going down. He gutted the military, cut programs, no pay raises. Moral hit all time lows. Equipment had no spare parts, no money or research for new programs and replacement technology. Mission readiness was at all time lows.
We got smart and elected Reagan and returned the US stature in the world.
If you don't think it could get worse, just see what happens if Hilliary gets elected.
"Those that don't remember history are doomed to repeat it." |
|

Noone i
|
absolutely frightening!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|

www.scapegoatz.com
|
It will be bad for the military, cut backs, not maintaining the equipment ,and we will not be ready for any other attacks |
|

?
 |
Makes me sick to my stomach. Especially considering what Bill did to our Military in 1993. Cut the military budget and then got a bj. What a guy! NOT! |
|

VodkaTonic
|
she has no experience as an executive of anything...she is hostile to the military...I personally believe that she would only be good at screwing things up and getting people killed, yes, even more than the current Commander in Chief. |
|

bill l
|
i wouldn't mind her being the cook in the military...but that's about as far as i will go with her. |
|

satcomgrunt
|
Not good her husbands record on defense does not give any sign she will be strong on defense. |
|

politicaladvisor2
|
disastor |
|

John C
|
horrible joke on our services |
|

SpursFan123
|
Lord help us and I'm not religious at all. |
|

haas_love
 |
Canada sounds really nice....LOL. Seriously, I would move for the years she was over our country. She would run it into the ground. I just don't see any good in her becoming president. I would love to see a woman president one day, but I do NOT want it to be her! |
|

tai D
 |
Anyone but her, not just on a military level, but on others as well. |
|

Brad V
|
I think you have every right to have trouble with this one. We live in a dangerous world, and we need someone in there that understands this and is prepared to counter act that danger. What the hell would Hillary do, re-activate Madeline Albright, or worse, send slick Willie to confront our adveraries ? |
|

april
|
Terrible; she has no respect for the people in Uniform, nor does she understand them. Besides, the Clinton's cut our Military to nearly half and it came back and bit us in the ***. |
|

?
|
It will NEVER happen. You can rest assured on that. The american electorate is not suicidal. |
|

Uncle Dud
|
We are in trouble. |
|

hooahwife
 |
Henry, they didn't mention anything about having an issue with her being CIC because of her being a woman....believe it or not, I think they have an issue with it because she is Hillary!
I think it is SCARY! She isn't a friend of the military. |
|

BILL D
|
Well business as usual, hillary will have to restart this war for israel somehow. Lies to the public and the military are sure to follow. One thing is for sure, Israel will sleep tight, while U.S. boys let the bullets bite. Nuke israel :) |
|

cmrwash
 |
can't stop laughing! |
|

Albannach
|
Este asustado! Este muy asustado! |
|

osunumberonefan
|
May God help us all. I hate to say it but I have a funny feeling she'd be worse than George Bush |
|

Mrsjvb
 |
if I absolutely must deal with a Democrat in Office, I want it to be Obama. Him, I can deal with. |
|

thevonbankfamily
 |
Could she be any worse? We are in a devastatingly expensive war, in several countries, costing thousands of human lives, with no end in sight. Even Repubs are admitting Bush's military course is a historic failure.
I may not really love the idea of Hillary in charge of anything, but really, how could it get much worse? |
|

HonestJoe
|
Might as well give the military squirt guns.. |
|

Vampire 13R
 |
Couldn't be worse |
|

Henry VIII
|
There are female Generals so one or two steps up is no big deal. Why would her gender have anything to do with her being the CIC or the fact that she is who she is , for that matter? |
|

miXzo
 |
Can't be any worse than the man who's in charge of it now. |
|

azawalli
 |
What makes you think she'd be any worse than the guy in charge now. I know you neocons get hard or wet at the idea of "being tough," so here's an example of a female commander-in-chief for you: Margaret Thatcher, who fought the Falklands war. Whether that was a good idea, is another question, as it was war over a bunch of isolated rocky islands in the middle of nowhere. |
|

Richard P
|
I do not think one should simply equate the fact she is a women therefore she could not possible understand what a mostly majority male military force has to achieve, go through or do in order to achieve success in peace or war. Not to mention when one talks about combat, it is an all male military. With exception of some accidents or mistakes that put woman in front line combat situations. As far as groundpounders are concerned. I think she will be a bad commander an chief do to her ideology of being mostly a pacifist. Lets not even delve into the fact. That the Democrats as a party have almost always been bad for the military, military R/D research and so on. Not to mention their record as Commander in Chief in the past has not been stellar. With maybe an exception for FDR. So while I feel she might be good on foreign policy, that's about it. What can be said about a Commander an Chief who put her beliefs on what the latest polls says at the time. That votes for a declaration of action. To later recant it because the polls go south. A woman that had a chance to cut the purse strings for what she says is an unjust war. But does not as long as her and her fellow Democrats get their payoffs. So a good Commander and Chief, No! She doesn't even know what she believes. She does not have an exit strategy for Irag. Just talks allot and produces no outcome on anything she promises.
Peace!!! Love!!! Health!!! |
|

|
|
|