|

lighthouse
|
Good idea, nuke them before they nuke us |
|

.45 Peacemaker
 |
That would be one way to that Iran could get nuclear weapons, everyone would be happy then. So yes I agree with you |
|

cd1048
 |
The "WE" will be Israel. If Iran keeps it up, all there will be there is green glass. You don't use nukes as a threat against countries that already have them. Ahmadinejad has set Iran on a path of distruction, death and famine. |
|

Incorrectly Political
|
You must have a lot of points to throw away to ask a stupid question like this. |
|

Sadiq
|
Using Barabarian methods for settling a matter is extinct. |
|

kenkahoo
 |
Global warming increased. Nice idea.
Start of World War III. Nice idea.
Sarcasm!!! |
|

Its not me Its u
|
Let the diplomacy and sanctions play out first....the stakes are too high to be irrational. There are 'red lines' to make the nuclear decision, if it comes to that, e.g., the time they can enrich uranium at 90-95%~2007, the date they develop a trigger mechanism ~2010 and the date for engineering a small enough device to fit on a warhead ~2012...in other words, there's plenty of time to play this thing out. There may even be a regime change by that time...so hold on to your itchy fingers till then. |
|

Marcy
|
How about NOT. |
|

kimrayford2000
|
if we would have nuked them in 86 we would not be going through what we are going through now |
|

desiya
|
Certainly I don't agree. It would be the worst type of State Terrorism. How far will the GWB party go to destroy world peace - what is left of it, that is - on imaginary, cooked up and engineered pretexts. It could possibly be the beginning of the end of the so called super power, and with it most of the world.
This PS is for kimrayford2000 & lighthouse: How many WMD you found from Iraq in that one-sided war on terrorism? And how much was the collateral damage in terms of human lives.. Iraqis and those GALLANT people whose bodies are still being received in boxes??? For God's sake, don't noose down an average American to the extent that he always lives in fear in his own home. |
|

impeachgwb
 |
Very Very bad idea ~! how about Impeaching bush instead! |
|

Whodaman™
 |
There are other better weapons we can use except for nukes. |
|

bigtalltom
 |
No. Conventional weapons should be enough to do the necessary damage needed, while minimizing collateral damage. |
|

Nelson_DeVon
|
As appealing as that may sound at times I am sure that most of the Iranian people are good people. I have been to iraq. I believe that most of the people in Iraq are good people. We do not want to be a terrorist nation. |
|

captain provins
 |
i don't agree because we need solve the iran problem peacfully |
|

alaska_huskey_helga
|
maybe, but what about the innocent people who aren't involved. |
|

spacenut10100
|
NO Get rid of the nukes |
|

teknique
 |
what the hell is wrong with you. wasnt nuking Horishima enough, do you not give shiit about the human race, do you not care about those who are innocent, children for example, thnk about all the children!! seriously you really need to thnk about life and what you saying, want did an innocent little iranian boy do to you, that makes thnk iran should be nuked.
just thnk. |
|

Miyazaki-san
 |
I don't.
That's a terrible idea. |
|

sharam4ever
|
I agree with GABRIELJONAS83 that this question should never be asked if call yourself a human and i think the gay who call himself LIGHTHOUSE should be an evil with this kind of mind. |
|

Detective Yahoo
|
who is this? Persident Bush? |
|

Leener~b
|
No way! I agree with others that say- get rid of all nukes!!! |
|

gabrieljonas83
 |
Who agrees that this question should NEVER BE ASKED? It's sad that this question is even posed. Nukes are not our friends. |
|

brubble828
|
tactical nukes won't cause too much collateral damage. it's not a bad idea but a tomahawk from basrah wouldn't be so bad either. please, for israel's sake though, beat them to it. dont let'm bomb anybody first. the whole world is with them now against hamas. |
|

Joe Blow
|
We need to hit about a dozen Iranian sites with tactical nukes now. |
|

Middle 1 Double 0
|
US should mind its own business. Iran should mind its own business too. US definitely must stop trying to be the world police. likewise Iran should understand that the world will never be fully Islamic. Nukes won't solve anything, but extremist from both sides must be eradicated for the end of the current conflict. |
|

|
|
|