|

shjOlds_442
 |
Because he is hiding in another country. |
|

jaws65
|
I think because people are protecting him and we are not doing enough to go after them |
|

StarGazer
|
maybe because the bush family and the bin ladens have a long standing business relationship...hmmm, just a thought. |
|

foofighters0909
 |
If someone has a whole country of mountains to hide in AND a neighbor with porous borders and more mountains. they wont be found if they don't want to be |
|

Obama=Establishment Demagogue
|
Hmmm, don't be too surprise of an October surprise. Who knows, maybe Bush will deliver a gift to the Republican party and miraculously capture Bin Laden. |
|

at3wells
 |
Ill repost this from a question that I answered the other day:
Yes and No. We know with a reasonable degree of certainty that he is somewhere inside northern Pakistan's Autonomous Region. We, I mean US Americans, are not allowed to enter this region and conduct search and sweep operations. The region is some of the most treacherous terrain in the entire world and the locals are hardcore jihadists and fiercly loyal to the Taliban/Al Qaeda rank and file. Government is non existant in this region and it is completely lawless. We're pretty sure he is there somewhere but we cant go get him and they sure as hell will never offer him up to us. |
|

Russell C
|
Ask Bill Clinton. Sudan was ready to hand bin Laden to him on a plate, but he refused.
He's a hard guy to find. He doesn't use a cell phone or computer because they can be tracked (which is usually how we catch terrorists). He's fully aware of the bounty on his head and he keeps moving. Only a handful of his most trusted aides know his location at any given time.
We will get him, eventually. |
|

Maria
|
Who told you we couldn't? |
|

iltmaemc
 |
because some people can make more money if he is still alive. some people would be out of a job if he is found |
|

CuriositySatisfaction
 |
7 years ...No Bin Laden
Yea,What's up with that? |
|

beabuck50
 |
not lookin for him bush says bin laden is not a threat no more. they payed him to take the blame and they know where he is. |
|

newfish82
|
He is in Pakistan doing shots with Pervez Musharaff, or however you spell it. also 7 years and ground zero is still a hole, what the hell ever happend to the Freedom Tower or whatever was supposed to go up, kinda dropped the ball on that whole deal it seems.
Actually James it doesn't because both those stories were hoaxes, if you take the time to read things other than gossip. |
|

Clint N
 |
Because he is our new Bogeyman. As long as he is still on the run he is a "threat" and we can still fight the war on terror. |
|

zuezug
 |
Could have done it.
Capturing bin Laden would not have served Dubyas handlers interests.
They didn't want to capture bin Laden.
they wanted to invade Iraq. |
|

Imma be famous oneday
|
that's what im wondering too....we went overseas to get bin laden but since we couldnt get him...we just settled for sudam(sp?)... are they even looking for bin laden anymore...I haven't heard much about him lately... |
|

Tigerlily86
 |
We can.
We have satellites up in space that can track anyone.
It's all apart of the U.S. government's agenda to take over our bodies and chip us. |
|

Hawkeye
 |
I've heard some people speak of rumors they've heard that the U.S. Govt has all ready captured Osama Bin Laden and is just waiting for the right time to spring the news on the U.S public! Talk about a P.R. campaign! Can you imagine _THAT_!
Thoughts/comments<?>!!
"ALL you NEED is LOVE!
The B E A T L E S!
Vincent Reagan
"Hawkeye"
:)
;) |
|

jamesfentress44
|
We don't need to.....he's going to be our new vice
president, he's not expected to take the oath with his
hand on the Bible or salute the American Flag, does that
sound like any candidate we have now running for
president? |
|

shiroironin
 |
Because hes CIA! |
|

Cheap is Talk
|
We just did. Deal with it. |
|

|
|
|